From: sboyd@codeaurora.org (Stephen Boyd)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] hvc_dcc: Fix bad code generation by marking assembly volatile
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 13:52:46 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D0FD02E.3080901@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=8F3keaAQ2o+V8gNncNM02c9k9=DRtd5GyP_LH@mail.gmail.com>
On 12/20/2010 01:49 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 3:08 PM, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>> Without marking the asm __dcc_getstatus() volatile my compiler
>> decides [...]
> What compiler ? That might be a usefull information to know,
> espectially 5 years from now when tracing code history. There has been
> similar issue with gcc 4.5 recently. AFAIK, in the same idea, the
> final change has been to mark the asm volatile.
Sure, we can replace "my compiler" with "my compiler (arm-eabi-gcc (GCC)
4.4.0)".
--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-20 21:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20101201192856.GA731@suse.de>
2010-12-18 5:16 ` [PATCH] hvc_dcc: Simplify assembly for v6 and v7 ARM Stephen Boyd
2010-12-20 17:51 ` Daniel Walker
2010-12-20 18:39 ` Stephen Boyd
2010-12-20 18:46 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-12-20 20:08 ` [PATCH 0/3] hvc_dcc cleanups and fixes Stephen Boyd
2010-12-20 20:08 ` [PATCH 1/3] hvc_dcc: Fix bad code generation by marking assembly volatile Stephen Boyd
2010-12-20 21:39 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-02 9:00 ` Pavel Machek
2011-01-02 18:49 ` David Brown
2011-01-03 5:50 ` Pavel Machek
2011-01-04 18:49 ` Tony Lindgren
2010-12-20 21:49 ` Arnaud Lacombe
2010-12-20 21:52 ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2010-12-20 22:10 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-12-20 20:08 ` [PATCH 2/3] hvc_dcc: Simplify put_chars()/get_chars() loops Stephen Boyd
2010-12-20 20:08 ` [PATCH 3/3] hvc_dcc: Simplify assembly for v6 and v7 ARM Stephen Boyd
2010-12-20 21:44 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-04 18:52 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-06 1:49 ` [PATCH 0/3] hvc_dcc cleanups and fixes Stephen Boyd
2011-01-06 3:20 ` Greg KH
2011-02-03 22:17 ` Greg KH
2011-02-03 23:19 ` Stephen Boyd
2011-02-03 23:30 ` Greg KH
2011-02-03 23:48 ` [PATCHv2 " Stephen Boyd
2011-02-03 23:48 ` [PATCHv2 1/3] hvc_dcc: Fix bad code generation by marking assembly volatile Stephen Boyd
2011-02-03 23:48 ` [PATCHv2 2/3] hvc_dcc: Simplify put_chars()/get_chars() loops Stephen Boyd
2011-02-03 23:48 ` [PATCHv2 3/3] hvc_dcc: Simplify assembly for v6 and v7 ARM Stephen Boyd
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D0FD02E.3080901@codeaurora.org \
--to=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).