From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: michael.williamson@criticallink.com (Michael Williamson) Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 08:40:43 -0500 Subject: [PATCH v2] davinci: Add additional JTAG code for AM-1808 and OMAP-L138 Rev 2.0 SoCs In-Reply-To: <4D148335.8070209@mvista.com> References: <1293132288-22325-1-git-send-email-michael.williamson@criticallink.com> <4D148335.8070209@mvista.com> Message-ID: <4D14A2DB.7080907@criticallink.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hello Sergei, On 12/24/2010 06:25 AM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > Hello. > > On 23-12-2010 22:24, Michael Williamson wrote: > >> From: Sudhakar Rajashekhara > >> The JTAG variant code for Rev-2.0 silicon of the OMAP-L138 has changed. >> In addition, the variant code for the AM-1808 SoC appears to match >> the Rev-2.0 code for the OMAP-L138. Add an additional entry to support >> these chips. > >> This patch is orignally from a patch on the arago project, here: >> http://arago-project.org/git/projects/?p=linux-omapl1.git;a=commit;h=6157618435e313a444cdf059702bd34036a6e2b7 > >> Further information related to the need for this patch can be located at >> http://e2e.ti.com/support/embedded/f/354/p/67290/248486.aspx >> http://linux.davincidsp.com/pipermail/davinci-linux-open-source/2010-November/021224.html > >> This patch was tested using an AM-1808 SoC on a MityARM-1808 SoM card. It >> was also tested using a Rev 1.0 silicon OMAP-L138 on a MityDSP-L138F card. > >> Signed-off-by: Michael Williamson >> Tested-by: Michael Williamson >> Reported-by: Nicolas Luna > > I saw that the original patch was signed off by Sudhakar -- why you omitted that? > Ignorance, mostly... That patch was for the Arago project, and not the mainline, and I wasn't sure if I could add a sign-off with express instruction from Sudhakar. Wasn't trying to slight anyone... I will add Sudhakar's sign-off, assuming that is OK with Sudhakar. Should I remove my sign-off? Thanks for the help. -Mike