[PATCH v2] davinci: Add additional JTAG code for AM-1808 and OMAP-L138 Rev 2.0 SoCs

[sshtylyov@mvista.com (Sergei Shtylyov)]

Hello.

Michael Williamson wrote:

>>> From: Sudhakar Rajashekhara<sudhakar.raj@ti.com>

>>> The JTAG variant code for Rev-2.0 silicon of the OMAP-L138 has changed.
>>> In addition, the variant code for the AM-1808 SoC appears to match
>>> the Rev-2.0 code for the OMAP-L138.  Add an additional entry to support
>>> these chips.

>>> This patch is orignally from a patch on the arago project, here:
>>> http://arago-project.org/git/projects/?p=linux-omapl1.git;a=commit;h=6157618435e313a444cdf059702bd34036a6e2b7
>>> Further information related to the need for this patch can be located at
>>> http://e2e.ti.com/support/embedded/f/354/p/67290/248486.aspx
>>> http://linux.davincidsp.com/pipermail/davinci-linux-open-source/2010-November/021224.html

>>> This patch was tested using an AM-1808 SoC on a MityARM-1808 SoM card.  It
>>> was also tested using a Rev 1.0 silicon OMAP-L138 on a MityDSP-L138F card.

>>> Signed-off-by: Michael Williamson <michael.williamson@criticallink.com>
>>> Tested-by: Michael Williamson <michael.williamson@criticallink.com>
>>> Reported-by: Nicolas Luna <luna.id@gmail.com>

>>    I saw that the original patch was signed off by Sudhakar -- why you omitted that?

> Ignorance, mostly...

> That patch was for the Arago project, and not the mainline, and I wasn't sure if 
> I could add a sign-off with express instruction from Sudhakar.  Wasn't trying to 
> slight anyone...

> I will add Sudhakar's sign-off, assuming that is OK with Sudhakar.

> Should I remove my sign-off? 

    No.

> Thanks for the help.

> -Mike

WBR, Sergei