linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: dick@softplc.com (Dick Hollenbeck)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: ks8695_gettimeoffset
Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2011 00:32:30 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D22BEFE.4090001@softplc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D22BDAA.2030902@softplc.com>

On 01/04/2011 12:26 AM, Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
> On 01/03/2011 01:55 PM, avictor.za at gmail.com wrote:
>> hi,
>>
>>> Is it possible at all to implement clocksource/clockevents for KS8695? As Dick and "Register Description" already said you cannot read the time register, so clocksource->read cannot be implemented to return ticks elapsed. Or do I see it wrong?
>> I'm pretty sure I tested this when I originally submitted the KS8685
>> processor support (May 2007), and the timer registers are readable.
>> I would of tested with a userspace program that sat in a tight loop
>> calling gettimeofday().
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>   Andrew Victor
>>
> Thanks Andrew.  Can you explain how this is supposed to be a duration, even
> if one of these two registers was a readable down counter?
>
>  elapsed = __raw_readl(KS8695_TMR_VA + KS8695_T1TC) + __raw_readl(KS8695_TMR_VA + KS8695_T1PD);
>
>
> Which of the two is a down counter, and why would it be added to one that is not, or is?
>
> While you are thinking about that, I have a userspace test program that can peek at the two registers using a memory mapped region pointer, and it will tell us if the value is changing over time.

Sorry, I should have just ran the program before posting.  Both registers
are constant at 25000 while running.   So my original summary is correct,
that this C function is not worth anything.

Where do we go from here?

Dick

  reply	other threads:[~2011-01-04  6:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-12-20 19:09 ks8695_gettimeoffset Dick Hollenbeck
2010-12-20 19:30 ` ks8695_gettimeoffset Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-12-20 19:37   ` ks8695_gettimeoffset Dick Hollenbeck
2010-12-27 15:37   ` ks8695_gettimeoffset Yegor Yefremov
2011-01-03  0:28     ` ks8695_gettimeoffset Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-03 19:55     ` ks8695_gettimeoffset avictor.za at gmail.com
2011-01-04  6:26       ` ks8695_gettimeoffset Dick Hollenbeck
2011-01-04  6:32         ` Dick Hollenbeck [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-12-20 19:32 ks8695_gettimeoffset Dick Hollenbeck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4D22BEFE.4090001@softplc.com \
    --to=dick@softplc.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).