From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: nm@ti.com (Nishanth Menon) Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2011 12:46:19 -0600 Subject: [PATCH 4/5] omap2plus: voltage: Trivial linking fix 'undefined reference' In-Reply-To: <1294165576-15628-5-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> References: <1294165576-15628-1-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> <1294165576-15628-2-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> <1294165576-15628-3-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> <1294165576-15628-4-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> <1294165576-15628-5-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> Message-ID: <4D236AFB.2050301@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Santosh Shilimkar had written, on 01/04/2011 12:26 PM, the following: [..] > diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/voltage.h b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/voltage.h > index 710f4ea..c095351 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/voltage.h > +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/voltage.h > @@ -65,9 +65,6 @@ struct voltagedomain { > char *name; > }; > > -/* API to get the voltagedomain pointer */ > -struct voltagedomain *omap_voltage_domain_lookup(char *name); > - > /** > * struct omap_volt_data - Omap voltage specific data. > * @voltage_nominal: The possible voltage value in uV > @@ -131,6 +128,9 @@ int omap_voltage_register_pmic(struct voltagedomain *voltdm, > struct omap_volt_pmic_info *pmic_info); > void omap_change_voltscale_method(struct voltagedomain *voltdm, > int voltscale_method); > +/* API to get the voltagedomain pointer */ > +struct voltagedomain *omap_voltage_domain_lookup(char *name); > + > int omap_voltage_late_init(void); > #else > static inline int omap_voltage_register_pmic(struct voltagedomain *voltdm, > @@ -144,6 +144,10 @@ static inline int omap_voltage_late_init(void) > { > return -EINVAL; > } > +static inline struct voltagedomain *omap_voltage_domain_lookup(char *name) > +{ > + return NULL; the omap_voltage_domain_lookup uses ERR_PTR() for all return values which are handled by the callers with IS_ERR() I think you should return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL) -- Regards, Nishanth Menon