[GIT PULL] AT91: patches for v2.6.38-rc1

[GIT PULL] AT91: patches for v2.6.38-rc1

[Nicolas Ferre]

Hi Russell,

Can you please pull those little changes for AT91? They add two 
new boards already discussed on the mailing list and a little 
cleanup patch:

The following changes since commit 9e9bc9736756f25d6c47b4eba0ebf25b20a6f153:

  Merge branch 'v4l_for_linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mchehab/linux-2.6 (2011-01-06 18:32:12 -0800)

are available in the git repository at:

  git://github.com/at91linux/linux-2.6-at91.git for_rmk

Igor Plyatov (1):
      AT91: Support for gsia18s board

Jesper Juhl (1):
      AT91: board-sam9m10g45ek.c: Remove duplicate inclusion of mach/hardware.h

Sergio Tanzilli (1):
      AT91: Acme Systems FOX Board G20 board files

 arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig                |   13 +
 arch/arm/mach-at91/Makefile               |    2 +
 arch/arm/mach-at91/board-foxg20.c         |  274 ++++++++++++++
 arch/arm/mach-at91/board-gsia18s.c        |  584 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/arm/mach-at91/board-sam9m10g45ek.c   |    1 -
 arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/gsia18s.h |   33 ++
 6 files changed, 906 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-at91/board-foxg20.c
 create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-at91/board-gsia18s.c
 create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/gsia18s.h

Thanks, best regards,
-- 
Nicolas Ferre

[GIT PULL] AT91: patches for v2.6.38-rc1

[Russell King - ARM Linux]

On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 07:00:16PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> Hi Russell,
> 
> Can you please pull those little changes for AT91? They add two 
> new boards already discussed on the mailing list and a little 
> cleanup patch:

Has this already been in linux-next?

We should only be merging new code during a merge window which has
already had visibility in linux-next, with the exception of bug fixes
and regression fixes.

Regression fixes can be merged at any time provided they're obvious.
Any regression fix should be acceptable during the merge window.

Bug fixes any time up until (I'd say) the last week of the -rc series.

[GIT PULL] AT91: patches for v2.6.38-rc1

[Nicolas Ferre]

Le 14/01/2011 19:04, Russell King - ARM Linux :
> On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 07:00:16PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
>> Hi Russell,
>>
>> Can you please pull those little changes for AT91? They add two 
>> new boards already discussed on the mailing list and a little 
>> cleanup patch:
> 
> Has this already been in linux-next?

I must admit that... no.

> We should only be merging new code during a merge window which has
> already had visibility in linux-next, with the exception of bug fixes
> and regression fixes.

I understand your point but those are only *board* files that are lying
around for one or two months.
I was really wishing to see them included in mainline during merge
window as they are not core ARM nor AT91 files...

BTW the git tree is based on the tree you specify to Eric: "9e9bc973".

> Regression fixes can be merged at any time provided they're obvious.
> Any regression fix should be acceptable during the merge window.
> 
> Bug fixes any time up until (I'd say) the last week of the -rc series.

Best regards,
-- 
Nicolas Ferre

[GIT PULL] AT91: patches for v2.6.38-rc1

[Russell King - ARM Linux]

On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 07:14:16PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> Le 14/01/2011 19:04, Russell King - ARM Linux :
> > On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 07:00:16PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> >> Hi Russell,
> >>
> >> Can you please pull those little changes for AT91? They add two 
> >> new boards already discussed on the mailing list and a little 
> >> cleanup patch:
> > 
> > Has this already been in linux-next?
> 
> I must admit that... no.
> 
> > We should only be merging new code during a merge window which has
> > already had visibility in linux-next, with the exception of bug fixes
> > and regression fixes.
> 
> I understand your point but those are only *board* files that are lying
> around for one or two months.
> I was really wishing to see them included in mainline during merge
> window as they are not core ARM nor AT91 files...

Okay for this time, but please ensure that stuff like this is in
linux-next before the merge window next time so that it can have
some exposure.