From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: eric@eukrea.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Eric_B=E9nard?=) Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 10:02:26 +0100 Subject: [RFC 2/2] AT91: Update board-cpu9krea to support the 9260/9G20 variants in a single image In-Reply-To: <20110117075002.GH14798@game.jcrosoft.org> References: <1295113835-6776-1-git-send-email-albin.tonnerre@free-electrons.com> <1295113835-6776-2-git-send-email-albin.tonnerre@free-electrons.com> <20110117075002.GH14798@game.jcrosoft.org> Message-ID: <4D3405A2.70401@eukrea.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Jean-Christophe, On 17/01/2011 08:50, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > On 18:50 Sat 15 Jan , Albin Tonnerre wrote: >> Since patch "Support SAM9260 and SAM9G20-based boards in the same kernel >> image" makes it possible to support both types of SoCs, cpu9krea must be >> updated to cope with that. Otherwise, selecting both the 9260 and 9G20 >> variants will result in only the 9260 variant being supported. >> >> Signed-off-by: Albin Tonnerre >> --- > do you really need 2 machine id? > this was needed when 9260 & 9G20 were not merged. Please if you change our platform files keep the 2 machine ID else that will break upgrade path on existing machines. Thanks, Eric