From: ryan@bluewatersys.com (Ryan Mallon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ep93xx: implement gpiolib set_debounce for built-in GPIOs
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 12:47:46 +1300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D40B2A2.2070403@bluewatersys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201101261622.48750.hartleys@visionengravers.com>
On 01/27/2011 12:22 PM, H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
> GPIO Ports A, B, and F on the ep93xx provide interrupt capability. It is
> possible to debounce the input signal on these ports when interrupts are
> enabled.
>
> Support for this debounce capability was provided with an ep93xx internal
> function. Now that gpiolib knows about gpio debounce, use the gpiolib
> method and do not export the internal function.
>
> Signed-off-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com>
> Cc: Ryan Mallon <ryan@bluewatersys.com>
>
> ---
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/gpio.c b/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/gpio.c
> index bec34b8..a889fa7 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/gpio.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/gpio.c
> @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ static inline void ep93xx_gpio_int_mask(unsigned line)
> gpio_int_unmasked[line >> 3] &= ~(1 << (line & 7));
> }
>
> -void ep93xx_gpio_int_debounce(unsigned int irq, int enable)
> +static void ep93xx_gpio_int_debounce(unsigned int irq, bool enable)
> {
> int line = irq_to_gpio(irq);
> int port = line >> 3;
> @@ -75,7 +75,6 @@ void ep93xx_gpio_int_debounce(unsigned int irq, int enable)
> __raw_writeb(gpio_int_debounce[port],
> EP93XX_GPIO_REG(int_debounce_register_offset[port]));
> }
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(ep93xx_gpio_int_debounce);
>
> static void ep93xx_gpio_ab_irq_handler(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
> {
> @@ -335,6 +334,20 @@ static void ep93xx_gpio_set(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset, int val)
> local_irq_restore(flags);
> }
>
> +static int ep93xx_gpio_set_debounce(struct gpio_chip *chip,
> + unsigned offset, unsigned debounce)
> +{
> + int gpio = chip->base + offset;
> + int irq = gpio_to_irq(gpio);
> +
> + if (irq < 0)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + ep93xx_gpio_int_debounce(irq, debounce ? true : false);
We should just move the code from ep93xx_gpio_int_debounce here. Why
have two functions to do one thing?
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static void ep93xx_gpio_dbg_show(struct seq_file *s, struct gpio_chip *chip)
> {
> struct ep93xx_gpio_chip *ep93xx_chip = to_ep93xx_gpio_chip(chip);
> @@ -434,6 +447,18 @@ void __init ep93xx_gpio_init(void)
> EP93XX_SYSCON_DEVCFG_GONIDE |
> EP93XX_SYSCON_DEVCFG_HONIDE);
>
> - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(ep93xx_gpio_banks); i++)
> - gpiochip_add(&ep93xx_gpio_banks[i].chip);
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(ep93xx_gpio_banks); i++) {
> + struct gpio_chip *chip = &ep93xx_gpio_banks[i].chip;
> +
> + /*
> + * Ports A, B, and F support input debouncing when
> + * used as interrupts.
> + */
> + if (!strcmp(chip->label, "A") ||
> + !strcmp(chip->label, "B") ||
> + !strcmp(chip->label, "F"))
This could just be if *chip->label == 'A'. I don't really mind either way.
> + chip->set_debounce = ep93xx_gpio_set_debounce;
> +
> + gpiochip_add(chip);
> + }
> }
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/include/mach/gpio.h b/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/include/mach/gpio.h
> index c991b14..c57152c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/include/mach/gpio.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/include/mach/gpio.h
> @@ -99,8 +99,6 @@
> /* maximum value for irq capable line identifiers */
> #define EP93XX_GPIO_LINE_MAX_IRQ EP93XX_GPIO_LINE_F(7)
>
> -extern void ep93xx_gpio_int_debounce(unsigned int irq, int enable);
> -
> /* new generic GPIO API - see Documentation/gpio.txt */
>
> #include <asm-generic/gpio.h>
There don't appear to be any users of ep93xx_gpio_int_debounce anyway.
But with the above mentioned changes:
Acked-by: Ryan Mallon <ryan@bluewatersys.com>
--
Bluewater Systems Ltd - ARM Technology Solution Centre
Ryan Mallon 5 Amuri Park, 404 Barbadoes St
ryan at bluewatersys.com PO Box 13 889, Christchurch 8013
http://www.bluewatersys.com New Zealand
Phone: +64 3 3779127 Freecall: Australia 1800 148 751
Fax: +64 3 3779135 USA 1800 261 2934
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-26 23:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-26 23:22 [PATCH] ep93xx: implement gpiolib set_debounce for built-in GPIOs H Hartley Sweeten
2011-01-26 23:47 ` Ryan Mallon [this message]
2011-01-26 23:59 ` H Hartley Sweeten
2011-01-27 0:06 ` Ryan Mallon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D40B2A2.2070403@bluewatersys.com \
--to=ryan@bluewatersys.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).