From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: lars@metafoo.de (Lars-Peter Clausen) Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 13:48:43 +0100 Subject: [RFC] add pwmlib support In-Reply-To: <20110131075408.GH9041@pengutronix.de> References: <1296217283-14531-1-git-send-email-s.hauer@pengutronix.de> <4D447E5E.6060007@metafoo.de> <20110131075408.GH9041@pengutronix.de> Message-ID: <4D46AFAB.3070805@metafoo.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 01/31/2011 08:54 AM, Sascha Hauer wrote: > On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 04:35:33AM +0100, Arun MURTHY wrote: >> Hi Sascha, >> >>>> I Cced the people working with PWMs in the kernel in the hope that >>> they can >>>> give input on what's missing / wrong in this implementation >>>> >>>> Sascha >>>> >>> >>> Hi >>> >>> There have been two other proposals for a generic PWM api during the >>> last year. >>> You might want to take a look at them. >>> >>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/2/9/275 >>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/9/28/107 >>> >>> I've added Bill Gatliff and Arun Murthy to Cc. >>> >> >> As said by Lars, we already have developed the pwm core driver and >> progressing towards aligning the existing pwm drivers to the pwm core >> driver. >> These set of patches are expected to be out in LKML by this week. > > Nice, problem solved without me having to work on it ;). I wouldn't call it problem solved yet. I liked your approach better so far, but lets see how the next iteration of Aruns patches turn out. - Lars