From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ryan@bluewatersys.com (Ryan Mallon)
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 09:42:02 +1300
Subject: [RFC,PATCH 1/3] Add a common struct clk
In-Reply-To: <20110209203900.GT27982@pengutronix.de>
References: <1297233693.242364.862698430999.1.gpush@pororo>
	<4D52F73A.4010707@bluewatersys.com>
	<20110209203900.GT27982@pengutronix.de>
Message-ID: <4D52FC1A.9090700@bluewatersys.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 02/10/2011 09:39 AM, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:
> Hi Ryan,
> 
> On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 09:21:14AM +1300, Ryan Mallon wrote:
>>> +int clk_enable(struct clk *clk)
>>> +{
>>> +	unsigned long flags;
>>> +	int ret = 0;
>>> +
>>> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&clk->enable_lock, flags);
>>
>> 	WARN_ON(clk->prepare_count == 0); ?
> This is added in patch 3/3

Ah, missed that. I still think that patch 3 should just be rolled into
patch 1. I don't see why we should add a new file in one patch and then
randomly add some warning code to it in another patch. It makes
reviewing harder for one thing :-).

~Ryan

-- 
Bluewater Systems Ltd - ARM Technology Solution Centre

Ryan Mallon         		5 Amuri Park, 404 Barbadoes St
ryan at bluewatersys.com         	PO Box 13 889, Christchurch 8013
http://www.bluewatersys.com	New Zealand
Phone: +64 3 3779127		Freecall: Australia 1800 148 751
Fax:   +64 3 3779135			  USA 1800 261 2934