From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: henry.nestler@gmail.com (Henry Nestler)
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 20:58:20 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] DM9000B: Fix PHY power for network down/up
In-Reply-To: <20110222.102410.260079835.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <4D618B5D.5040001@henry.nestler.mail.gmail.com>
	<4D62491F.4050602@ru.mvista.com>
	<4D62D323.7010403@henry.nestler.mail.gmail.com>
	<20110222.102410.260079835.davem@davemloft.net>
Message-ID: <4D64155C.9050407@henry.nestler.mail.gmail.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Hello David,

On 22.02.2011 19:24, David Miller wrote:
> From: Henry Nestler <henry.nestler@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 22:03:31 +0100
> 
>> On 21.02.2011 12:14, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
>>> On 21-02-2011 0:45, Henry Nestler wrote:
>>>> +	udelay(1000); /* delay needs by DM9000B */
>>>
>>>     Why not mdelay(1)?
>>
>> Because udelay is the base of mdelay.
>> See include/linux/delay.h:31
>>
>> #define mdelay(n) ... udelay((n)*1000)
> 
> He is telling you to use mdelay(1) because it's clearer.  Please do
> so.

Thanks, that text explains it better. No problem. I will resend this patch.

-- 
Henry N.