From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: s.nawrocki@samsung.com (Sylwester Nawrocki) Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2011 10:34:21 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: S5P: Rename MIPI-CSIS header and update Copyright In-Reply-To: <01a501cbd95c$37069cf0$a513d6d0$%kim@samsung.com> References: <1299087289-29926-1-git-send-email-s.nawrocki@samsung.com> <1299087289-29926-2-git-send-email-s.nawrocki@samsung.com> <01a501cbd95c$37069cf0$a513d6d0$%kim@samsung.com> Message-ID: <4D6F609D.3020501@samsung.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 03/03/2011 05:33 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote: > Sylwester Nawrocki wrote: >> >> Signed-off-by: Sylwester Nawrocki >> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park >> --- >> arch/arm/plat-s5p/dev-csis0.c | 2 +- >> arch/arm/plat-s5p/dev-csis1.c | 2 +- >> arch/arm/plat-s5p/include/plat/csis.h | 28 > -------------------------- >> -- >> arch/arm/plat-s5p/include/plat/mipi_csis.h | 28 >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 4 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) >> delete mode 100644 arch/arm/plat-s5p/include/plat/csis.h >> create mode 100644 arch/arm/plat-s5p/include/plat/mipi_csis.h >> > Oops, why didn't use '-M'? > It can show me this like following. > Yes, I could do better. Sorry, I had two version of the patch and somehow ended up with te wrong one being send. > .../plat-s5p/include/plat/{csis.h => mipi_csis.h} | 10 +++++----- > 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > rename arch/arm/plat-s5p/include/plat/{csis.h => mipi_csis.h} (68%) > > Secondly, I remember this... > Following is your response at that time. > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2011-January/038037.ht > ml > Yes, but afterwards I realized there will be issues when one is trying to build common kernel binary for multiple SoCs. Nevertheless I will prepare common code for S5P and a callback into platform code, so at least we can move on with the v4l driver. Thanks, -- Sylwester Nawrocki Samsung Poland R&D Center