linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: andy@warmcat.com (Andy Green)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] OMAP3 I2C document why cpu type and not peripheral unit ID used to probe
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2011 08:25:51 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D70A20F.6070508@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D700441.50206@ti.com>

On 03/03/2011 09:12 PM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:

Hi -

Thanks for your comments.

> The issue is that this revision field is not really documented in OMAP4
> TRM, so you should not rely on it. Moreover, as you already noticed, the
> revision number is not even accurate. OMAP3 and 4 are using a different
> programming model but this is not reflected in this field.

OK.

> Since that issue is quite common in many OMAP IPs, we introduced a SW
> field in hwmod_class that should reflect the change in IP programming
> model. For the moment it is a simple integer that we increment each time
> there is change in a programming model that will impact the driver.
>
> You can check how it was done for the timer for example:

Alright.  In I2C case the path is hwmod class -> platform data though 
since hwmod content directly is not used in the driver, but platform 
data is.

>> +
>> if (cpu_is_omap44xx())
>> dev->regs = (u8 *) omap4_reg_map;
>
> OK, this is not part of your patch, but any call to cpu_is are forbidden
> from the driver. As soon as you have the revision field from hwmod you
> can get rid of all that code.

Well, as you point out they are not forbidden enough since I was just 
working with what was already there.

However this hwmod scheme will cover it all AFAICS, so I will extend the 
patches to nuke all cpu_is... from the driver.

-Andy

  reply	other threads:[~2011-03-04  8:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-03-03 13:50 [PATCH 0/4] OMAP 3 and 4 i2c fixes Andy Green
2011-03-03 13:50 ` [PATCH 1/4] OMAP3 and 4 hwmod I2C units only allow 16 bit access Andy Green
2011-03-03 17:42   ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-03-03 17:56     ` Andy Green
2011-03-03 20:40       ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-03-04  8:33         ` Andy Green
2011-03-04 10:05           ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-03-04 15:20   ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-03-03 13:50 ` [PATCH 2/4] OMAP3 I2C document why cpu type and not peripheral unit ID used to probe Andy Green
2011-03-03 21:12   ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-03-04  8:25     ` Andy Green [this message]
2011-03-03 13:50 ` [PATCH 3/4] OMAP3 and 4 i2c mark extended reg enums as extended only Andy Green
2011-03-03 21:33   ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-03-04  8:32     ` Andy Green
2011-03-04 10:05       ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-03-03 13:50 ` [PATCH 4/4] OMAP3 and 4 I2C use cpu type consistently for new register availability Andy Green
2011-03-03 21:45   ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-03-03 21:55 ` [PATCH 0/4] OMAP 3 and 4 i2c fixes Cousson, Benoit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4D70A20F.6070508@linaro.org \
    --to=andy@warmcat.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).