From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: andy@warmcat.com (Andy Green) Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 15:18:11 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 2 14/18] I2C: OMAP1/OMAP2+: create omap I2C functionality flags for each cpu_... test In-Reply-To: References: <20110308105934.23531.83540.stgit@otae.warmcat.com> <20110308110904.23531.66727.stgit@otae.warmcat.com> Message-ID: <4D779A33.9070905@linaro.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 03/09/2011 02:31 PM, Somebody in the thread at some point said: Hi - > Minor comment, Can you use > BIT(0) for 1, BIT(1) for 2 ... BIT (8) for 0x100 OK, I agree it will be nicer. Thanks for the comment. I guess I can just change this and issue just this guy as try 3 rather than sending the whole series mostly unchanged. In that case, I'll take care of Benoit's member re-ordering to match the scripts at the same time and issue that guy as try 3 as well. -Andy