From: maxime.coquelin-nonst@stericsson.com (Maxime Coquelin)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCHv1 0/2] Export SoC info through sysfs
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 14:36:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D78D3DB.90708@stericsson.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110310130527.GA2154@besouro.research.nokia.com>
Hi Eduardo,
On 03/10/2011 02:05 PM, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
>
>> The first patch introduces the common part, which provides an interface to the platform to register its name, and exports platform-defined IDs to user-space.
>> The IDs strings can be provided in two ways: either with a pointer to the string, or by a callback returning the string.
> Do you mind refreshing my memory why we need two ways of providing data to these attributes?
> I mean, I think if we provide the attribute value during registration time should be enough
> and simpler.
>
> Unless you guys are talking about attributes with changes over the time, I don't really see
> the need for the callback there. At least from the original scope, I don't see any attributes
> which would be exported under soc info which would change over the time.
>
> Or am I missing something?
It would be simpler indeed. But I don't know what are other SoC vendors
needs, does someone need to export a piece of information which may
change at runtime? If we all agree that providing a string at
registration is enough, I'll remove it.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-10 13:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-09 16:59 [RFC PATCHv1 0/2] Export SoC info through sysfs Maxime Coquelin
2011-03-09 16:59 ` [RFC PATCHv1 1/2] " Maxime Coquelin
2011-03-09 17:39 ` Jamie Iles
2011-03-10 9:45 ` Maxime Coquelin
2011-03-09 17:47 ` Mark Brown
2011-03-10 9:58 ` Maxime Coquelin
2011-03-10 13:18 ` Mark Brown
2011-03-10 13:16 ` Maxime Coquelin
2011-03-09 19:58 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-03-10 12:56 ` Maxime Coquelin
2011-03-10 13:25 ` Linus Walleij
2011-03-10 14:08 ` Mark Brown
2011-03-10 14:29 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-03-10 14:44 ` Mark Brown
2011-03-10 15:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-03-10 15:10 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-03-10 15:17 ` Linus Walleij
2011-03-10 15:21 ` Helmut Raiger
2011-03-10 15:20 ` Mark Brown
2011-03-10 16:11 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-03-10 16:19 ` Mark Brown
2011-03-10 16:54 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-03-10 14:23 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-03-10 16:05 ` Linus Walleij
2011-03-10 16:32 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-03-10 17:08 ` Linus Walleij
2011-03-11 16:14 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-03-09 20:38 ` Ryan Mallon
2011-03-09 16:59 ` [RFC PATCHv1 2/2] ux500: Export U8500 " Maxime Coquelin
2011-03-09 20:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-03-10 13:05 ` [RFC PATCHv1 0/2] Export " Eduardo Valentin
2011-03-10 13:36 ` Maxime Coquelin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D78D3DB.90708@stericsson.com \
--to=maxime.coquelin-nonst@stericsson.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).