[ PATCH V2 0/7] add the GPMI controller driver for IMX23/IMX28

[b32955@freescale.com (Huang Shijie)]

Hi:
> Hi,
>
> Huang Shijie writes:
>> The general-purpose media interface(GPMI) controller is a flexible interface
>> to up to several NAND flashs.
>>
>> The Bose Ray-Choudhury Hocquenghem(BCH) module is a hardware ECC accelerator.
>>
>> With the help of BCH, the GPMI controller can choose to do the hardware ECC or
>> not.
>>
>> This driver is based the Shawn Guo's DMA patches for IMX23/IMX28,
>> please refer to :
>> 	http://git.infradead.org/users/vkoul/slave-dma.git/commit/a580b8c5429a624d120cd603e1498bf676e2b4da
>>
>> v1 -->  v2:
>> 	[0] merge the common files into the gpmi-nfc-main.c
>> 	[1] change the code to get the clock.
>> 	[2] remove the timing in the nand_device_info{}
>> 	[3] fix DMA errors
>> 	[4] add the nand_device_info.[ch] to generic code
>> 	[5] use the chip->onfi_version for the ONFI nand
>> 	[6] useless init
>> 	[7] others
>>
>> Huang Shijie (7):
>>    ARM: add GPMI support for imx23/imx28
>>    dmaengine: change the flags of request_irq()
>>    MTD : add the database for the NANDs
>>    MTD : add the common code for GPMI controller driver
>>    MTD : add GPMI support for imx23
>>    MTD : add GPMI support for imx28
>>    MTD : add GPMI driver in the config and Makefile
>>
>>   arch/arm/mach-mxs/Kconfig                       |    2 +
>>   arch/arm/mach-mxs/clock-mx23.c                  |    3 +
>>   arch/arm/mach-mxs/clock-mx28.c                  |    3 +
>>   arch/arm/mach-mxs/devices-mx23.h                |    3 +
>>   arch/arm/mach-mxs/devices-mx28.h                |    3 +
>>   arch/arm/mach-mxs/devices/Kconfig               |    3 +
>>   arch/arm/mach-mxs/devices/Makefile              |    1 +
>>   arch/arm/mach-mxs/devices/platform-gpmi.c       |  140 ++
>>   arch/arm/mach-mxs/include/mach/devices-common.h |    4 +
>>   arch/arm/mach-mxs/include/mach/gpmi-nfc.h       |   62 +
>>   arch/arm/mach-mxs/mach-mx23evk.c                |   37 +
>>   arch/arm/mach-mxs/mach-mx28evk.c                |   37 +
>>   drivers/dma/mxs-dma.c                           |    2 +-
>>   drivers/mtd/nand/Kconfig                        |   10 +
>>   drivers/mtd/nand/Makefile                       |    1 +
>>   drivers/mtd/nand/gpmi-nfc/Makefile              |    7 +
>>   drivers/mtd/nand/gpmi-nfc/bch-regs-imx23.h      |  342 ++++
>>   drivers/mtd/nand/gpmi-nfc/bch-regs-imx28.h      |  342 ++++
>>
> Those two files are identical except for the file name included in the
> comment.
> If a new SoC with differences in the register layout pops up, that
> should be handled by using namespace prefixes for the definitions
> rather than by adding new files.
>
I ever thought to merge the headers into one file, such as 
"bch-regs-imx23_imx28.h".
But what about the imx508? Do i have to split the header in future.
Or add a separate file such as "bch-regs-imx508.h"?


>>   drivers/mtd/nand/gpmi-nfc/gpmi-regs-imx23.h     |  381 ++++
>>   drivers/mtd/nand/gpmi-nfc/gpmi-regs-imx28.h     |  370 ++++
>>
> These files differ only in a few definitions. They should be combined
> into one file and the differences sorted out using appropriate
> namespace prefixes like:
> |#define MX23_BP_GPMI_CTRL0_LOCK_CS	22
> |#define MX23_BM_GPMI_CTRL0_LOCK_CS	(1<<  MX23_BP_GPMI_CTRL0_LOCK_CS)
> |#define BP_GPMI_CTRL0_CS		20
> |#define MX23_BM_GPMI_CTRL0_CS		(3<<  BP_GPMI_CTRL0_CS)
> |#define MX28_BM_GPMI_CTRL0_CS		(7<<  BP_GPMI_CTRL0_CS)
>
> The code could either use if clauses checking the platform_id to
> decide which definition to use, or use hooked functions and initialize
> the function pointers depending on the platform_id.
>
The same issue with the imx508.

> Also, I prefer notations like '(1<<  22)' over '0x00400000' for bit
> masks, because that makes it easier to match the definition with the
> bit numbers given in the documentation.
>
> Further the 'RSVD' entries should be removed from the register
> definitions (even if they are generated from the XML).
>
thanks. I will modify it in next version.
>>   drivers/mtd/nand/gpmi-nfc/hal-imx23.c           |  555 +++++
>>   drivers/mtd/nand/gpmi-nfc/hal-imx28.c           |  503 +++++
>>
> These files are more or less identical. The code should be moved to
> the main file and the differences sorted out using the platform_ids.
>
In actually, the two files are identical.

It's a big headache to me.

Do i have to sacrifice the logic clearness for reducing some code to 
make the less code lines?

If I merge the code to the main file, the main file will become bigger.

And I have to add the imx508 code in the main file too in future.

What's more, the GPMI will be the only NAND controller for the IMX cpu, 
even in the imx6x,
What should i do about the imx6x? still add it in the main file?

An acceptable solution is merge:
[1] merge the imx23/imx28 into one separate file, such as hal-imx23-imx28.c
[2] add the hal-imx508.c or hal-imx6x.c in future.

What about the solution? I really reluctant to merge them in the main file.


Best Regards
Huang Shijie