linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* JFFS2 on intel possible recursive locking detected
@ 2011-03-31 13:16 Jonathan Cameron
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Jonathan Cameron @ 2011-03-31 13:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

Hi All, 

This is very much a heads up with far too few details.

Ultimately this doesn't seem to cause any problems on the system
bar the following warning.

It's with the flash on an intel pxa271.  Not sure exactly when
it first showed up, but has been around for a few months and
is still occurring with v2.6.39-rc1

It'll be a while before I have time to try chasing this down myself
unfortunately.

So has anyone else seen this?

[   65.627241] 
[   65.627306] =============================================
[   65.634237] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
[   65.639628] 2.6.38+ #20
[   65.642067] ---------------------------------------------
[   65.647453] jffs2_gcd_mtd2/404 is trying to acquire lock:
[   65.652838]  (&chip->mutex){+.+...}, at: [<c01ff980>] get_chip+0xf8/0x204
[   65.659757] 
[   65.659768] but task is already holding lock:
[   65.665576]  (&chip->mutex){+.+...}, at: [<c01ff4d4>] chip_ready+0x2d0/0x2f4
[   65.672654] 
[   65.672662] other info that might help us debug this:
[   65.679173] 1 lock held by jffs2_gcd_mtd2/404:
[   65.683602]  #0:  (&chip->mutex){+.+...}, at: [<c01ff4d4>] chip_ready+0x2d0/0x2f4
[   65.691123] 
[   65.691131] stack backtrace:
[   65.695629] [<c0085220>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0xec) from [<c00be760>] (__lock_acquire+0xfbc/0x1930)
[   65.704747] [<c00be760>] (__lock_acquire+0xfbc/0x1930) from [<c00bf134>] (lock_acquire+0x60/0x74)
[   65.713650] [<c00bf134>] (lock_acquire+0x60/0x74) from [<c02a9dc8>] (mutex_lock_nested+0x4c/0x2f0)
[   65.722602] [<c02a9dc8>] (mutex_lock_nested+0x4c/0x2f0) from [<c01ff980>] (get_chip+0xf8/0x204)
[   65.731303] [<c01ff980>] (get_chip+0xf8/0x204) from [<c0200ab4>] (do_erase_oneblock+0x48/0x1f0)
[   65.739996] [<c0200ab4>] (do_erase_oneblock+0x48/0x1f0) from [<c01feeb8>] (cfi_varsize_frob+0x198/0x250)
[   65.749472] [<c01feeb8>] (cfi_varsize_frob+0x198/0x250) from [<c020242c>] (cfi_intelext_erase_varsize+0x2c/0x54)
[   65.759627] [<c020242c>] (cfi_intelext_erase_varsize+0x2c/0x54) from [<c01f9a50>] (part_erase+0x70/0xc4)
[   65.769147] [<c01f9a50>] (part_erase+0x70/0xc4) from [<c0185514>] (jffs2_erase_pending_blocks+0x644/0x7a0)
[   65.778794] [<c0185514>] (jffs2_erase_pending_blocks+0x644/0x7a0) from [<c0183fc0>] (jffs2_garbage_collect_pass+0x22c/0x810)
[   65.789993] [<c0183fc0>] (jffs2_garbage_collect_pass+0x22c/0x810) from [<c0185a04>] (jffs2_garbage_collect_thread+0x168/0x1a0)
[   65.801385] [<c0185a04>] (jffs2_garbage_collect_thread+0x168/0x1a0) from [<c00ac238>] (kthread+0x80/0x88)
[   65.810941] [<c00ac238>] (kthread+0x80/0x88) from [<c0080b64>] (kernel_thread_exit+0x0/0x8)

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2011-03-31 13:16 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-03-31 13:16 JFFS2 on intel possible recursive locking detected Jonathan Cameron

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).