From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sboyd@codeaurora.org (Stephen Boyd) Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2011 00:15:55 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] ARM: BUG() dies silently In-Reply-To: References: <1301602523-9906-1-git-send-email-omar.ramirez@ti.com> <4D959058.7010606@codeaurora.org> Message-ID: <4D981EAB.8070209@codeaurora.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org (Please stop top posting) On 4/1/2011 3:29 PM, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Stephen, > > Sorry for the confusion, but in fact I was talking about the patch to > make ARM use the generic bug handling via an undef instruction instead > of calling ______bug() or writing to memory address 0. Please see > here: > > http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/viewpatch.php?id=6808/1 Yes I've seen your patch (and even posted comments on it which have not been responded to). Correct me if I'm wrong, but that patch with CONFIG_BUG=n would lead to the same error that Omar is seeing because the code only modifies the bug infrastructure when CONFIG_BUG=y. -- Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.