From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: santosh.shilimkar@ti.com (Santosh Shilimkar) Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2011 14:03:33 +0530 Subject: RFC, GIC based smp_cross_call cleanup suggestion In-Reply-To: <20110404082518.GA19178@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <10921831-0170-4106-bb3a-a52515a32c3e@VA3EHSMHS002.ehs.local> <20110402085133.GE8482@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20110403103730.GB4213@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <4D9851B5.20100@ti.com> <20110403134837.GE4213@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <4D997F53.5010409@ti.com> <20110404082518.GA19178@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: <4D99825D.2020604@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 4/4/2011 1:55 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 01:50:35PM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: >> On 4/3/2011 7:18 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: >>> On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 04:23:41PM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: >>>> If you plan to commit this change then I can move these to >>>> other OMAP4 header file. >>> >>> Can you send me a patch to do that please? >>> >> Here it is.. Generated against latest mainline. >> Also attached just in case for any mailer issues. > > Looks good, please send to the patch system. patch 6860/1 Regards Santosh