From: sboyd@codeaurora.org (Stephen Boyd)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: BUG() dies silently
Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2011 10:36:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D9B5327.1070709@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTimJkQ9afnO=6gKiBqWUo+Uv=hWx2Q@mail.gmail.com>
On 4/4/2011 6:55 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 12:15 AM, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>> Yes I've seen your patch (and even posted comments on it which have not
>> been responded to).
> Hi Stephen,
>
> Not yet! Don't worry I will get to it. I like the suggestion and am
> pleased that you pointed me to it, thank you.
>
Great!
>> Correct me if I'm wrong, but that patch with CONFIG_BUG=n would lead to
>> the same error that Omar is seeing because the code only modifies the
>> bug infrastructure when CONFIG_BUG=y.
> Well if CONFIG_BUG=n then there is no bug infrastructure, The whole
> file is skipped and it falls back to the asm-generic/bug.h which has
> even more #ifdefs in it. But I think we end up here:
>
> #define BUG() do {} while(0)
>
> After all the patch removes the *(int*)0 = 0 code by virtue of
> CONFIG_GENERIC_BUG=y, right? If I have this wrong then I will have to
> break out the C preprocessor...
>
Ah you're right. Too many ifdefs going on there.
--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-05 17:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-31 20:15 [PATCH] ARM: BUG() dies silently Omar Ramirez Luna
2011-04-01 1:47 ` Simon Glass
2011-04-01 8:44 ` Stephen Boyd
2011-04-01 22:29 ` Simon Glass
2011-04-03 7:15 ` Stephen Boyd
2011-04-05 1:55 ` Simon Glass
2011-04-05 17:36 ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2011-04-05 2:29 ` Ramirez Luna, Omar
2011-04-05 5:46 ` Simon Glass
2011-04-05 16:02 ` Ramirez Luna, Omar
2011-04-05 16:43 ` Simon Glass
2011-09-17 6:07 ` Rabin Vincent
2011-09-19 14:26 ` Ramirez Luna, Omar
2011-09-19 14:43 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-09-19 16:59 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-09-19 18:02 ` Simon Glass
2011-09-19 18:25 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-09-19 18:32 ` Ramirez Luna, Omar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D9B5327.1070709@codeaurora.org \
--to=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).