From: mchehab@redhat.com (Mauro Carvalho Chehab)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 00/34] Make kernel build deterministic
Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2011 15:29:19 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D9B5F7F.6090609@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1302027412.2924.7.camel@mulgrave.site>
Em 05-04-2011 15:16, James Bottomley escreveu:
> On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 08:49 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 04:58:47PM +0200, Michal Marek wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> this series makes it possible to build bit-identical kernel image and
>>> modules from identical sources. Of course the build is already
>>> deterministic in terms of behavior of the code, but the various
>>> timestamps embedded in the object files make it hard to compare two
>>> builds, for instance to verify that a makefile cleanup didn't
>>> accidentally change something. A prime example is /proc/config.gz, which
>>> has both a timestamp in the gzip header and a timestamp in the payload
>>> data. With this series applied, a script like this will produce
>>> identical kernels each time:
>>
>> Very nice stuff. Do you want to take the individual patches through one
>> of your trees, or do you mind if the subsystem maintainers take them
>> through theirs?
>
> I'm happy for this to go through a single tree.
Me too.
With respect to the patches I was c/c (patches 13, 14, 31):
Acked-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
Thanks,
Mauro.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-05 18:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-05 14:58 [PATCH 00/34] Make kernel build deterministic Michal Marek
2011-04-05 14:59 ` [PATCH 33/34] usb/lh7a40x_udc: Drop __DATE__ usage Michal Marek
2011-04-05 16:25 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-04-06 8:23 ` Michal Marek
2011-04-05 15:49 ` [PATCH 00/34] Make kernel build deterministic Greg KH
2011-04-05 18:16 ` James Bottomley
2011-04-05 18:29 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab [this message]
2011-04-05 18:44 ` Greg KH
2011-04-05 19:24 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-04-06 8:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-04-06 9:07 ` Michal Marek
2011-04-06 9:25 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-04-06 9:23 ` Michal Marek
2011-04-06 9:01 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D9B5F7F.6090609@redhat.com \
--to=mchehab@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).