From: skannan@codeaurora.org (Saravana Kannan)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Common clock and dvfs
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 18:35:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DB22CE7.7090404@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DB22996.8020109@codeaurora.org>
On 04/22/2011 06:21 PM, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> On 04/22/2011 12:37 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> On Fri, 22 Apr 2011, Colin Cross wrote:
>>
<snipped out the code since thunderbird is messing it up for some reason>.
> I did some crappy factorization of functions, returning -ECRAP without
> unlocking, etc, but you get the point.
>
> Whether the "level" translates to controlling power supply A or B or A &
> B is upto the implementation of dvfs_class->dvfs_update() which is per
> SOC/mach/arch.
Not sure if this was obvious from my previous email. But each
SOC/mach/arch could have more than one dvfs_class depending on the no.
of power supply combinations that are manipulated for dvfs.
-Saravana
--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-23 1:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-22 18:15 Common clock and dvfs Colin Cross
2011-04-22 19:37 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-04-23 1:21 ` Saravana Kannan
2011-04-23 1:35 ` Saravana Kannan [this message]
2011-04-23 13:14 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-04-22 19:40 ` Mark Brown
2011-04-22 19:48 ` Colin Cross
2011-04-22 20:35 ` Mark Brown
2011-04-22 21:18 ` Colin Cross
2011-04-25 11:03 ` Mark Brown
2011-04-25 8:33 ` Paul Walmsley
2011-04-25 18:26 ` Turquette, Mike
[not found] <4DC07F10.6010305@ti.com>
2011-05-05 5:08 ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-05-05 6:11 ` Colin Cross
2011-05-05 6:35 ` Paul Walmsley
2011-05-05 6:50 ` Colin Cross
2011-05-05 13:59 ` Mark Brown
2011-05-05 21:08 ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-05-05 23:15 ` Colin Cross
2011-05-06 17:36 ` Paul Walmsley
2011-05-06 8:13 ` MyungJoo Ham
2011-05-05 6:25 ` Paul Walmsley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DB22CE7.7090404@codeaurora.org \
--to=skannan@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).