From: viresh.kumar@st.com (viresh kumar)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH V3 2/7] dmaengine/dw_dmac: Replace spin_lock* with irqsave variants
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 15:48:42 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DBA9082.6040907@st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110428171020.GB17290@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On 04/28/2011 10:40 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 03:06:44PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> @@ -407,6 +410,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(dw_dma_get_dst_addr);
>> static void dwc_handle_cyclic(struct dw_dma *dw, struct dw_dma_chan *dwc,
>> u32 status_block, u32 status_err, u32 status_xfer)
>> {
>> + unsigned long flags;
>> +
>> if (status_block & dwc->mask) {
>> void (*callback)(void *param);
>> void *callback_param;
>> @@ -418,9 +423,9 @@ static void dwc_handle_cyclic(struct dw_dma *dw, struct dw_dma_chan *dwc,
>> callback = dwc->cdesc->period_callback;
>> callback_param = dwc->cdesc->period_callback_param;
>> if (callback) {
>> - spin_unlock(&dwc->lock);
>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dwc->lock, flags);
>> callback(callback_param);
>> - spin_lock(&dwc->lock);
>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&dwc->lock, flags);
>
> I'm really not convinced that this is anywhere near correct. I'm
> surprised this doesn't spit out a compiler warning.
>
Sorry, this is done by mistake.
--
viresh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-29 10:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-27 9:36 [PATCH V3 0/7] dmaengine/dw_dmac updates Viresh Kumar
2011-04-27 9:36 ` [PATCH V3 1/7] dmaengine/dw_dmac: call dwc_descriptor_complete from dwc_control with lock held Viresh Kumar
2011-04-27 9:36 ` [PATCH V3 2/7] dmaengine/dw_dmac: Replace spin_lock* with irqsave variants Viresh Kumar
2011-04-28 17:10 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-04-29 9:15 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-04-29 10:17 ` viresh kumar
2011-04-29 10:18 ` viresh kumar [this message]
2011-04-27 9:36 ` [PATCH V3 3/7] dmaengine/dw_dmac: don't call callback routine in case dmaengine_terminate_all() is called Viresh Kumar
2011-04-28 17:11 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-04-29 3:25 ` viresh kumar
2011-04-27 9:36 ` [PATCH V3 4/7] dmaengine/dw_dmac: Enable resubmission from callback routine Viresh Kumar
2011-04-28 17:12 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-04-27 9:36 ` [PATCH V3 5/7] dmaengine/dw_dmac: set residue as total len in dwc_tx_status if status is !DMA_SUCCESS Viresh Kumar
2011-04-27 9:36 ` [PATCH V3 6/7] dmaengine/dw_dmac: Divide one sg to many desc, if sg len is greater than DWC_MAX_COUNT Viresh Kumar
2011-04-27 9:36 ` [PATCH V3 7/7] dmaengine/dw_dmac: implement pause and resume in dwc_control Viresh Kumar
2011-04-27 9:40 ` [PATCH V3 0/7] dmaengine/dw_dmac updates viresh kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DBA9082.6040907@st.com \
--to=viresh.kumar@st.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).