From: ulf.hansson@stericsson.com (Ulf Hansson)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] mmci: sync DATAEND irq with dma transfer done
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 14:44:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DBAB2CB.2030700@stericsson.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110428170342.GA17290@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
>
> That's rather unfortunate, because it means that trying it on ARM
> hardware is going to hang indefinitely waiting for the nonexistent
> DMA stuff to finish.
I see the problem, we need a way of being able to switch between using
the dma callback and not using it. I think the variant data should be
used for this, what do you think?
>
> I remain unconvinced whether this problem applies only to ARMs
> evaluation boards as I believe the whole primecell DMA stuff from
> the outset is fundamentally misdesigned. I suspect there maybe SoCs
> out there which suffer from the same broken DMA issues which ARMs
> eval boards do.
>
> Maybe an alternative solution is on data end to set a timer, which
> is cancelled when the DMA engine callback arrives. If the timer
> expires, it means we have broken DMA and that needs to be shutdown
> for that instance.
This could be a very good alternative for error handling of the DMA job.
I will try to add some code that handles this.
>
> However, one thing worries me - what if the DMA callback comes before
> we get the data end interrupt. Given the weirdnesses of your
> implementation found so far (which are well beyond what's visible
> on ARMs own implementation) I wouldn't put any guarantees on the
> relative ordering of that either.
>
host->dataend and host->size==0 controls whether the data transfer has
finished successfully. I believe this should be handled correctly in my
patch. Maybe it is possible to make some minor restructuring to make it
more clear what the end condition really is, I can see if I can figure
something out.
BR
Ulf Hansson
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-29 12:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-19 9:02 [PATCH] mmci: sync DATAEND irq with dma transfer done Linus Walleij
2011-04-19 9:20 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-04-19 12:00 ` Linus Walleij
2011-04-19 12:03 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-04-20 16:29 ` Linus Walleij
2011-04-20 16:46 ` Vitaly Wool
2011-04-20 17:17 ` Linus Walleij
2011-04-20 17:58 ` Vitaly Wool
2011-04-20 20:11 ` Linus Walleij
2011-04-28 17:03 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-04-28 22:24 ` Martin Furmanski
2011-05-11 20:13 ` Linus Walleij
2011-04-29 12:44 ` Ulf Hansson [this message]
2011-04-29 13:49 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-05-06 8:13 ` Ulf Hansson
2011-05-12 8:36 ` Per Forlin
2011-05-12 13:15 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DBAB2CB.2030700@stericsson.com \
--to=ulf.hansson@stericsson.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).