From: bones@secretlab.ca (John Bonesio)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC 1/2] ARM: Tegra: Device Tree Support: Update how sdhci devices are initialized
Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 16:33:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DC9CB47.9000900@secretlab.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <74CDBE0F657A3D45AFBB94109FB122FF04986AA0A6@HQMAIL01.nvidia.com>
On 05/10/2011 04:22 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> John Bonesio wrote at Tuesday, May 10, 2011 4:33 PM:
>> The goal I'm working towards right now is to have the platform specific
>> code continue to register the devices that are inside the SoC. Then use
>> the device tree to register all other on board devices.
>
> Sure, that sounds right.
>
> Which branch are your patches aimed at? My discussions are all based
> on my experience with Grant's devicetree/test branch.
>
>> This patch doesn't accomplish the whole goal in one step, but gets the
>> code a little closer toward this goal.
>
> So what's confusing me is that I think the devicetree/test branch is
> already there; board-dt.c registers all 4 SDHCI controllers,
> tegra250.dtsi defines each controller's memory map etc., and disables
> them all, then tegra-harmony.dts and tegra-seaboard.dts enable the
> relevant subset of those controllers, and provides the required
> platform data for them.
>
> When adding the I2C controllers, it seems like they'd just work the
> same way as the existing SDHCI code.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-10 23:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20110510201108.22693.50319.stgit@riker>
[not found] ` <20110510201414.22693.7427.stgit@riker>
[not found] ` <74CDBE0F657A3D45AFBB94109FB122FF04986AA06A@HQMAIL01.nvidia.com>
[not found] ` <BANLkTingm7PCJPC-xCremYg_Ab7qFvPSag@mail.gmail.com>
2011-05-10 22:16 ` [RFC 1/2] ARM: Tegra: Device Tree Support: Update how sdhci devices are initialized Stephen Warren
2011-05-10 22:33 ` John Bonesio
2011-05-10 22:42 ` Mark Brown
2011-05-10 23:22 ` Stephen Warren
2011-05-10 23:33 ` John Bonesio [this message]
2011-05-11 5:01 ` Stephen Warren
2011-05-11 17:40 ` John Bonesio
2011-05-11 18:21 ` Grant Likely
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DC9CB47.9000900@secretlab.ca \
--to=bones@secretlab.ca \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).