From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sboyd@codeaurora.org (Stephen Boyd) Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2011 18:51:43 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 3/3] mach-u300: cleanup clockevent code In-Reply-To: References: <1306876145-6778-1-git-send-email-linus.walleij@stericsson.com> <20110601092229.GE3660@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: <4DE6ECAF.9080409@codeaurora.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 06/01/2011 03:03 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > Something like the below should work for both UP and SMP > > diff --git a/kernel/time/clockevents.c b/kernel/time/clockevents.c > index c027d4f..739801b 100644 > --- a/kernel/time/clockevents.c > +++ b/kernel/time/clockevents.c > @@ -173,6 +173,12 @@ static void clockevents_notify_released(void) > } > } > > +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP > +# define CPU_MASK_CHECK(x) WARN_ON(!x) > +#else > +# define CPU_MASK_CHECK(x) (!x) > +#endif > + > /** > * clockevents_register_device - register a clock event device > * @dev: device to register > @@ -182,7 +188,8 @@ void clockevents_register_device(struct clock_event_device *dev) > unsigned long flags; > > BUG_ON(dev->mode != CLOCK_EVT_MODE_UNUSED); > - BUG_ON(!dev->cpumask); > + if (CPU_MASK_CHECK(dev->cpumask)) > + dev->cpumask = cpumask_of(smp_processor_id()); > > raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&clockevents_lock, flags); Won't this print a big WARNING on SMP_ON_UP=y and is_smp() == false kernels? Is there a generic cross-architecture way to check for SMP at runtime? Also, I don't understand the original motivation for this change. The assignment to cpumask was there in the u300 timer code already so the commit text from Linus is a bit misleading/confusing. -- Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.