From: santosh.shilimkar@ti.com (Santosh Shilimkar)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: smp_twd: Reconfigure clockevents after cpufreq change
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 11:42:10 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DF6FBBA.7010309@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTik8sz+JQE1nTcEvZLo5PynwK0+zZA@mail.gmail.com>
On 6/14/2011 11:30 AM, Colin Cross wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 10:50 PM, Linus Walleij
> <linus.ml.walleij@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Colin, Per Fransson noted this:
>>
>>> From: Colin Cross<ccross@android.com>
>>
>>> +/*
>>> + * Updates clockevent frequency when the cpu frequency changes.
>>> + * Called on the cpu that is changing frequency with interrupts disabled.
>>> + */
>>> +static void twd_update_frequency(void *data)
>>> +{
>>> + twd_timer_rate = clk_get_rate(twd_clk);
>>> +
>>> + clockevents_update_freq(__get_cpu_var(twd_ce), twd_timer_rate);
>>> +}
>>
>> Will only update the clockevent on the CPU where the cpufreq notifier
>> gets called will it not? It's not called on each CPU AFAICT.
>>
>> So this function has to traverse all CPUs in twd_ce.
>
> OMAP and Tegra both iterate through all the affected cpus in the
> cpufreq driver and call cpufreq_notify_transtion once for each,
> setting freqs.cpu to the target cpu. The listener in the smp_twd
> driver then bounces through smp_call_function_single to make sure it
> is running on the affected cpu. I believe that is the correct way to
> handle multiple affected cpus.
>
I agree with Collin. That should be taken care by
"smp_call_function_single(freqs->cpu, )" with notifier
being called with all the available CPU's in the mask.
Linus,
Did you see any issue with this patch on your platform ?
Regards
Santosh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-14 6:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-01 9:15 [PATCH] ARM: smp_twd: Reconfigure clockevents after cpufreq change Linus Walleij
2011-06-14 5:50 ` Linus Walleij
2011-06-14 6:00 ` Colin Cross
2011-06-14 6:12 ` Santosh Shilimkar [this message]
2011-06-14 6:14 ` Linus Walleij
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-05-16 23:21 Colin Cross
2011-05-17 14:00 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-05-17 17:06 ` Colin Cross
2011-05-18 11:32 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-05-19 17:32 ` Linus Walleij
2011-05-19 23:26 ` Colin Cross
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DF6FBBA.7010309@ti.com \
--to=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).