linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sboyd@codeaurora.org (Stephen Boyd)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH] ARM: smp: Fix the CPU hotplug race with scheduler.
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 17:06:58 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E013222.6080208@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110621231035.GE23802@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>

On 06/21/2011 04:10 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 01:16:47PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> On 06/21/2011 03:26 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 03:51:00PM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>>>> On 6/21/2011 3:49 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>>>>> I won't be committing the init/calibrate.c change to a git tree - it
>>>>> isn't ARM stuff so it goes in patch form.
>>>> Patches with change log would be fine as well.
>>> The answer is not at the moment, but maybe soon.
>> Should we send those two patches to the stable trees as well? They seem
>> to fix issues with cpu onlining that have existed for a long time.
> Looks to me like the problem was introduced for 2.6.39-rc1, so we
> should probably get the fix into the 2.6.39-stable tree too.

Are we talking about the loops_per_jiffy problem or the cpu_active
problem? I would think the cpu_active problem has been there since SMP
support was added to ARM and the loops_per_jiffy problem has been there
(depending on the compiler) since 8a9e1b0 ([PATCH] Platform SMIs and
their interferance with tsc based delay calibration, 2005-06-23).

So pretty much every stable tree would want both of these patches.

-- 
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.

  reply	other threads:[~2011-06-22  0:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-20  9:23 [RFC PATCH] ARM: smp: Fix the CPU hotplug race with scheduler Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-20  9:50 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-20 10:14   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-20 10:28     ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-20 10:35       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-20 10:45         ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-20 11:42           ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-20 10:44       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-20 10:47         ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-20 11:13           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-20 11:25             ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-20 11:40               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-20 11:51                 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-20 12:19                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-20 12:27                     ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-20 12:57                       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-20 14:23                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-20 14:54                   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-20 15:01                     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-20 15:10                       ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-21  9:08                     ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-21 10:00                       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-21 10:17                         ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-21 10:19                           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-21 10:21                             ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-21 10:26                               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-21 20:16                                 ` Stephen Boyd
2011-06-21 23:10                                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-22  0:06                                     ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2011-06-22 10:06                                       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-20 10:19   ` Santosh Shilimkar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E013222.6080208@codeaurora.org \
    --to=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).