From: santosh.shilimkar@ti.com (Santosh Shilimkar)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 25/25] ARM: pm: omap34xx: convert to generic suspend/resume support
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 05:03:39 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E027BD3.6030500@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110622161021.GB9449@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On 6/22/2011 9:40 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> A couple of things to point out here:
>
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 04:16:58PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>> - mrc p15, 0, r4, c13, c0, 1 @ Context ID
>> - mrc p15, 0, r5, c13, c0, 2 @ User r/w thread and process ID
>> - mrc p15, 0, r6, c12, c0, 0 @ Secure or NS vector base address
>> - mrs r7, cpsr @ Store current cpsr
>> - stmia r8!, {r4-r7}
>
> 1. The User r/w thread and process ID is not saved/restored by Linux over
> context switches, so it doesn't serve any useful purpose to save and
> restore over resume.
>
It will be needed for CPUIDLE I guess.
> 2. Compare the instruction saving and restoring the vector base address
> (see below for the restore code.)
>
That's typo. It should have been mcr. Actually VBAR isn't used on GP
devices but might be used on secure devices. I know that common suspend
code doesn't consider this register. It's fine to keep it that way
and if OMAP needs it, it can save/restored outside common code.
Regards
Santosh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-22 23:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-22 15:08 [PATCH 00/25 v2] Re-jig cpu_suspend for a saner calling convention Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-22 15:08 ` [PATCH 01/25] ARM: pm: make MULTI_CPU and !MULTI_CPU resume paths the same Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-22 15:09 ` [PATCH 02/25] ARM: pm: move return address (for cpu_resume) to top of stack Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-22 15:09 ` [PATCH 03/25] ARM: pm: extract common code from MULTI_CPU/!MULTI_CPU paths Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-22 15:09 ` [PATCH 04/25] ARM: pm: preserve r4 - r11 across a suspend Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-22 15:10 ` [PATCH 05/25] ARM: pm: reallocate registers to avoid r2, r3 Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-22 15:10 ` [PATCH 06/25] ARM: pm: rejig suspend follow-on function calling convention Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-22 15:10 ` [PATCH 07/25] ARM: pm: move sa1100 to use proper suspend func arg0 Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-22 15:11 ` [PATCH 08/25] ARM: pm: convert cpu_suspend() to a normal function Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-22 15:11 ` [PATCH 09/25] ARM: pm: plat-s3c24xx: cleanup s3c_cpu_save Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-22 15:11 ` [PATCH 10/25] ARM: pm: sa1100: cleanup sa1100_cpu_suspend Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-22 15:12 ` [PATCH 11/25] ARM: pm: mach-s5pv210: cleanup s3c_cpu_save Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-22 15:12 ` [PATCH 12/25] ARM: pm: mach-exynos4: " Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-22 15:12 ` [PATCH 13/25] ARM: pm: mach-s3c64xx: " Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-22 15:13 ` [PATCH 14/25] ARM: pm: pxa: cleanup PXA suspend code Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-22 15:13 ` [PATCH 15/25] ARM: pm: sa1100: move cpu_suspend into C code Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-22 15:13 ` [PATCH 16/25] ARM: pm: pxa: " Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-22 15:14 ` [PATCH 17/25] ARM: pm: move cpu_init() call into core code Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-22 15:14 ` [PATCH 18/25] ARM: pm: arrange for cpu_proc_init() to be called on resume Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-22 15:14 ` [PATCH 19/25] ARM: pm: sa1100: no need to re-enable clock switching Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-22 15:15 ` [PATCH 20/25] ARM: pm: samsung: move cpu_suspend into C code Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-22 15:15 ` [PATCH 21/25] ARM: pm: samsung: no need to call flush_cache_all() Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-22 15:15 ` [PATCH 22/25] ARM: pm: omap: no need to save all registers in sleep34xx.S Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-22 15:16 ` [PATCH 23/25] ARM: pm: omap34xx: remove misleading comment and use of r9 Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-22 15:16 ` [PATCH 24/25] ARM: pm: ensure ARMv7 CPUs save and restore the TLS register Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-22 15:16 ` [PATCH 25/25] ARM: pm: omap34xx: convert to generic suspend/resume support Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-22 16:10 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-22 23:33 ` Santosh Shilimkar [this message]
2011-06-23 10:47 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-23 6:33 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-06-23 10:06 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-23 10:21 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-23 19:05 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-06-23 20:37 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-06-23 21:57 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-06-22 21:01 ` [PATCH 00/25 v2] Re-jig cpu_suspend for a saner calling convention Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-22 23:26 ` Santosh Shilimkar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E027BD3.6030500@ti.com \
--to=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).