linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: nicolas.ferre@atmel.com (Nicolas Ferre)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH for 3.0] AT91: Change nand buswidth logic to match hardware default configuration
Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2011 17:17:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E11D99D.7040005@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201107041713.23982.arnd@arndb.de>

Le 04/07/2011 17:13, Arnd Bergmann :
> On Monday 04 July 2011, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
>>> In this case, studying the patch more closely shows that it's
>>> very harmless, but I'd rather not have to look that closely.
>>
>> Well, in fact it is a fix against what was introduced in a 3.0 patch
>> which I found to be wrong.
>> The reason because I do not want to be in next kernel is the fact that
>> it can puzzle the user (people that want to use kernel without changing
>> the system_rev between 2.6.39 -> 3.0 and again revert their changes for
>> 3.0 -> 3.1).
>>
>>> Am I correct that the bug is a regression against 2.6.39?
>>
>> No, in fact it was introduced during 3.0 early -rc.
> 
> That's what I mean by 'regression against 2.6.39': it was working in 2.6.39,
> but later kernels are broken without this fix.

Absolutely (here broken = not easily understandable by user).

Bye,
-- 
Nicolas Ferre

      reply	other threads:[~2011-07-04 15:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-01 10:25 [PATCH for 3.0] AT91: Change nand buswidth logic to match hardware default configuration Nicolas Ferre
2011-07-04  9:37 ` Nicolas Ferre
2011-07-04 14:25   ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-07-04 14:41     ` Nicolas Ferre
2011-07-04 15:13       ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-07-04 15:17         ` Nicolas Ferre [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E11D99D.7040005@atmel.com \
    --to=nicolas.ferre@atmel.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).