From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: robherring2@gmail.com (Rob Herring) Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2011 12:59:47 -0500 Subject: [PATCH v4 2/2] ARM: l2x0: Add OF based initialization In-Reply-To: <201107062326.53737.arnd@arndb.de> References: <1309984979-8847-1-git-send-email-robherring2@gmail.com> <1309984979-8847-2-git-send-email-robherring2@gmail.com> <20110706210237.GB5371@ponder.secretlab.ca> <201107062326.53737.arnd@arndb.de> Message-ID: <4E174593.20107@gmail.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Russell, On 07/06/2011 04:26 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Wednesday 06 July 2011 23:02:37 Grant Likely wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 03:42:59PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: >>> From: Rob Herring >>> >>> This adds probing for ARM L2x0 cache controllers via device tree. Support >>> includes the L210, L220, and PL310 controllers. The binding allows setting >>> up cache RAM latencies and filter addresses (PL310 only). >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring >> >> Acked-by: Grant Likely >> >> By rights, this should go via the arm tree, but it depends on patches >> that are already in devicetree/next. Arnd, how do you want to handle >> this? I want to avoid rebasing devicetree/next. > > It's outside of the scope of the arm-soc tree really, the l2x0 code > is clearly core arm stuff, so it belongs into Russell's tree. > > I think it's best if Russell can provide an Ack for this and you > put it in the tree that already has the dependencies. > Any comments? Rob