linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: santosh.shilimkar@ti.com (Santosh Shilimkar)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] OMAP: clockdomain: Wait for powerdomain to be ON when using clockdomain force wakeup
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2011 00:48:55 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E214267.2090700@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1107150159580.16606@utopia.booyaka.com>

Hi Paul,

On 7/15/2011 1:03 AM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> cc'ing Patrick
>
> Hi Rajendra, Santosh,
>
> some comments here:
>
> On Wed, 13 Jul 2011, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>
>> While using clockdomain force wakeup method, not waiting for powerdomain
>> to be effectively ON may end up locking the clockdomain FSM until a
>> next wakeup event occurs.
>>
>> One such issue was seen on OMAP4430, where L4_PER was periodically
>> getting stuck in in-transition state when transitioning from from OSWR to ON.
>>
>> This issue was reported and investigated by Patrick Titiano<p-titiano@ti.com>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar<santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak<rnayak@ti.com>
>> Reported-by: Patrick Titiano<p-titiano@ti.com>
>> Cc: Kevin Hilman<khilman@ti.com>
>> Cc: Benoit Cousson<b-cousson@ti.com>
>> Cc: Paul Walmsley<paul@pwsan.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/arm/mach-omap2/clockdomain.c |    7 ++++++-
>>   1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clockdomain.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clockdomain.c
>> index b98a972..583cc3d 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clockdomain.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clockdomain.c
>> @@ -718,6 +718,8 @@ int clkdm_sleep(struct clockdomain *clkdm)
>>    */
>>   int clkdm_wakeup(struct clockdomain *clkdm)
>>   {
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>>   	if (!clkdm)
>>   		return -EINVAL;
>>
>> @@ -732,7 +734,10 @@ int clkdm_wakeup(struct clockdomain *clkdm)
>>
>>   	pr_debug("clockdomain: forcing wakeup on %s\n", clkdm->name);
>>
>> -	return arch_clkdm->clkdm_wakeup(clkdm);
>> +	ret = arch_clkdm->clkdm_wakeup(clkdm);
>> +	ret |= pwrdm_wait_transition(clkdm->pwrdm.ptr);
>
> Seems like this should just call pwrdm_state_switch() or
> pwrdm_clkdm_state_switch()?  (This second function looks superfluous, we
> should probably get rid of it.)
>
This comment was expected since initially we thought of using
pwrdm_clkdm_state_switch

pwrdm_clkdm_state_switch()
	|--> pwrdm_wait_transition()
	|--> pwrdm_state_switch()

What we need is only first function to ensure that we don't
proceed when PD is in middle of transition.

The second function is actually just doing those debug counter
updates and we wanted to avoid that since it's a live path.
Rajendra observed some huge latencies while doing the
profiling and the suspect was "pwrdm_state_switch()" which
actually keeps adding overhead because of those counter
updates.

> Shouldn't this be added to all of
> clkdm_{wakeup,sleep,allow_idle,deny_idle}() if it isn't there already?
>
clkdm_allow_idle() already has the power-domain wait.
This patch adds it for clkdm_wakeup() function.
clkdm_sleep(), this shouldn't be applicable since power
domain sleep transition is depdent on other clockdomains
in the PD and it's a lazy operation.
That leaves clkdm_deny_idle() and I guess we should
address this API as well.

If you agree with above, I can update the patch to address
remaining clkdm_deny_idle() function.

Regards
Santosh
Regards
Santosh

  reply	other threads:[~2011-07-16  7:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-13  3:26 [PATCH] OMAP: powerdomains: Make all powerdomain target states as ON at init Santosh Shilimkar
2011-07-13  3:26 ` [PATCH] OMAP: clockdomain: Wait for powerdomain to be ON when using clockdomain force wakeup Santosh Shilimkar
2011-07-15  8:03   ` Paul Walmsley
2011-07-16  7:48     ` Santosh Shilimkar [this message]
2011-08-11 14:07       ` Santosh
2011-08-12 14:27         ` Paul Walmsley
2011-08-17  1:47           ` Paul Walmsley
2011-08-17  5:11             ` Santosh
2011-07-15  7:54 ` [PATCH] OMAP: powerdomains: Make all powerdomain target states as ON at init Paul Walmsley
2011-07-16  7:28   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-08-17  1:50     ` Paul Walmsley
2011-07-15  8:03 ` Felipe Balbi
2011-07-15  8:10   ` Paul Walmsley
2011-07-15  8:17     ` Felipe Balbi
2011-07-15  8:23       ` Paul Walmsley
2011-07-15  8:37         ` Felipe Balbi
2011-08-17  1:56           ` Paul Walmsley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E214267.2090700@ti.com \
    --to=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).