From: archit@ti.com (Archit Taneja)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: conflicts between omap/cleanup branch and omap_dss2 tree
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 17:57:57 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E25784D.8070300@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110718080856.GW5783@atomide.com>
Hi,
On Monday 18 July 2011 01:38 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Arnd Bergmann<arnd@arndb.de> [110717 14:36]:
>> Hi Paul and Tomi,
>>
>> I'm trying to get the arm-soc tree integrated into linux-next, but right
>> now that fails because of lots of conflicts in the arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock44xx_data.c
>> and arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_44xx_data.c files.
>>
>> I've done a dumb resolution by pulling in the omap_dss2/for_next tree as a
>> depedency and taking Tomi's version of the files, which is probably wrong
>> but lets Stephen at least take the arm-soc tree.
>
> Yes that's the wrong way around for these files..
>
>> Please fix this properly in either the omap or the omap_dss2 trees.
>
> The clock and hwmod data patches should get queued by Benoit and Paul,
> so I'm suspecting these are some of Tomi's patches still in development.
>
> Tomi can you please check what you have in for-next?
Tomi is on vacation right now, but he checks his mail once in a while,
so we may get a response soon.
Tomi's for-next branch is not up to date yet. So it shouldn't be
considered for now. The HWMOD patches in Tomi's for-next branch will be
pushed by Paul as 3.1-rc fixes.
We will make a temporary branch which will contain all the DSS2 patches
which Tomi intended to push for this merge window, once he gets a
chance, he can quickly update his for-next branch with it.
Archit
>
> Regards,
>
> Tony
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-19 12:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-17 21:39 conflicts between omap/cleanup branch and omap_dss2 tree Arnd Bergmann
2011-07-18 8:08 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-07-19 12:27 ` Archit Taneja [this message]
2011-07-19 12:59 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-07-21 7:19 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2011-07-21 14:20 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E25784D.8070300@ti.com \
--to=archit@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).