[PATCH 3/3] dmaengine: at_hdmac: add slave config operation

[nicolas.ferre@atmel.com (Nicolas Ferre)]

On 07/07/2011 04:33 AM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 13:17 +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
>> Only change source/destination peripheral register access width.
> How about a little more explainable change log
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre<nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-K?nig<u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
>> ---
>>   drivers/dma/at_hdmac.c |   29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/dma/at_hdmac.c b/drivers/dma/at_hdmac.c
>> index 7096adb..9cb8044 100644
>> --- a/drivers/dma/at_hdmac.c
>> +++ b/drivers/dma/at_hdmac.c
>> @@ -954,6 +954,35 @@ static int atc_control(struct dma_chan *chan, enum dma_ctrl_cmd cmd,
>>   		clear_bit(ATC_IS_PAUSED,&atchan->status);
>>
>>   		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&atchan->lock, flags);
>> +	} else if (cmd == DMA_SLAVE_CONFIG) {
>> +		struct dma_slave_config *dmaengine_cfg = (void *)arg;
>> +		struct at_dma_slave	*atslave = chan->private;
> This API was created to remove chan->private, so this doesn't make sense
> at all. If your intent is to have a channels internal data, then you
> should consider embedding dma_chan into this structure (the way other
> dma drivers do) rather than using private field.

Yes, I need to rework this slave config part of the driver (and its 
related calling drivers).

So please drop this 3/3 patch of the series.

Best regards,
-- 
Nicolas Ferre