From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sboyd@codeaurora.org (Stephen Boyd) Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 19:23:12 -0700 Subject: [RFC] ARM Subarchitecture group maintainership In-Reply-To: References: <201105181047.17309.arnd@arndb.de> <4E2F0176.1080403@codeaurora.org> Message-ID: <4E2F7690.6010008@codeaurora.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 07/26/2011 06:47 PM, Barry Song wrote: > 2011/7/27 Stephen Boyd : >> On 05/18/2011 01:47 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >>> This is the draft plan for maintaining the ARM subarchitectures in a common >>> tree, as a way to help coordinate the upstream merging of the >>> arch/arm/{plat,mach}-* changes into Linus' tree. >>> >> [snip] >>> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS >>> index 8fce5e6..942d052 100644 >>> --- a/MAINTAINERS >>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS >>> @@ -630,6 +630,17 @@ S: Maintained >>> F: drivers/amba/ >>> F: include/linux/amba/bus.h >>> >>> +ARM SUBARCHITECTURES >>> +M: Arnd Bergmann >>> +M: Nicolas Pitre >>> +M: Thomas Gleixner >>> +M: arm at kernel.org >>> +L: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org (moderated for non-subscribers) >>> +S: MAINTAINED >>> +F: arch/arm/mach-*/ >>> +F: arch/arm/plat-*/ >>> +T: git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm/arm-subarch.git >>> + >>> ARM/ADI ROADRUNNER MACHINE SUPPORT >>> M: Lennert Buytenhek >>> L: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org (moderated for non-subscribers) >>> >> Is this patch (or something similar) going to be merged now that the ARM >> SoC tree is up and running? Also, is the arm at kernel.org alias working? > yes. arm soc tree has been working and 3.1 window has pulled from Arnd > several times. > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/arm/linux-arm-soc.git;a=summary > That didn't really answer my questions, but thanks for pointing to the arm-soc tree. -- Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.