From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: viresh.kumar@st.com (viresh kumar) Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2011 15:11:29 +0530 Subject: [PATCH V3 08/20] dmaengine/amba-pl08x: support runtime PM In-Reply-To: <1312447973.1539.24.camel@vkoul-udesk3> References: <1312447973.1539.24.camel@vkoul-udesk3> Message-ID: <4E3A6949.2050109@st.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 08/04/2011 02:22 PM, Koul, Vinod wrote: > i dont think pm_runtime_put_sync() is the right thing to do here. This > will call your suspend and return after suspend has been called. This > will delay your probe completion and have impact on system boot time, > this is a very wrong approach. > Please move this to _put, so that suspend will be called asynchronously > > Also while at it why should you require all the _put calls to be _sync > type? That was a mistake, and i already fixed this in a reply to Russell's mail today. -- viresh