From: santosh.shilimkar@ti.com (Santosh)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 18/22] gpio/omap: use pm-runtime framework
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 20:04:40 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E53BA80.7030200@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1312455893-14922-19-git-send-email-tarun.kanti@ti.com>
+ Rajendra and Benoit to comment on optional clock
handling.
On Thursday 04 August 2011 04:34 PM, Tarun Kanti DebBarma wrote:
> Call runtime pm APIs pm_runtime_get_sync() and pm_runtime_put_sync()
> for enabling/disabling clocks appropriately. Remove syscore_ops and
> instead use dev_pm_ops now.
>
> Signed-off-by: Charulatha V<charu@ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tarun Kanti DebBarma<tarun.kanti@ti.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c | 89 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
> index 0545d8f..bca6dcd 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
> @@ -79,6 +79,8 @@ struct gpio_bank {
> struct omap_gpio_reg_offs *regs;
> };
>
> +static void omap_gpio_mod_init(struct gpio_bank *bank);
> +
> #define GPIO_INDEX(bank, gpio) (gpio % bank->width)
> #define GPIO_BIT(bank, gpio) (1<< GPIO_INDEX(bank, gpio))
> #define GPIO_MOD_CTRL_BIT BIT(0)
> @@ -481,6 +483,19 @@ static int omap_gpio_request(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset)
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&bank->lock, flags);
>
> + /*
> + * If this is the first gpio_request for the bank,
> + * enable the bank module.
> + */
> + if (!bank->mod_usage)
> + if (IS_ERR_VALUE(pm_runtime_get_sync(bank->dev)< 0)) {
> + dev_err(bank->dev, "%s: GPIO bank %d "
> + "pm_runtime_get_sync failed\n",
> + __func__, bank->id);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank->lock, flags);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> /* Set trigger to none. You need to enable the desired trigger with
> * request_irq() or set_irq_type().
> */
> @@ -535,6 +550,19 @@ static void omap_gpio_free(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset)
> }
>
> _reset_gpio(bank, bank->chip.base + offset);
> +
> + /*
> + * If this is the last gpio to be freed in the bank,
> + * disable the bank module.
> + */
> + if (!bank->mod_usage) {
> + if (IS_ERR_VALUE(pm_runtime_put_sync(bank->dev)< 0)) {
> + dev_err(bank->dev, "%s: GPIO bank %d "
> + "pm_runtime_put_sync failed\n",
> + __func__, bank->id);
> + }
> + }
> +
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank->lock, flags);
> }
>
> @@ -561,6 +589,7 @@ static void gpio_irq_handler(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
>
> bank = irq_get_handler_data(irq);
> isr_reg = bank->base + bank->regs->irqstatus;
> + pm_runtime_get_sync(bank->dev);
>
> if (WARN_ON(!isr_reg))
> goto exit;
> @@ -622,6 +651,7 @@ static void gpio_irq_handler(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
> exit:
> if (!unmasked)
> chained_irq_exit(chip, desc);
> + pm_runtime_put_sync_suspend(bank->dev);
> }
>
> static void gpio_irq_shutdown(struct irq_data *d)
> @@ -1023,7 +1053,13 @@ static int __devinit omap_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> }
>
> pm_runtime_enable(bank->dev);
> - pm_runtime_get_sync(bank->dev);
> + pm_runtime_irq_safe(bank->dev);
> + if (IS_ERR_VALUE(pm_runtime_get_sync(bank->dev)< 0)) {
> + dev_err(bank->dev, "%s: GPIO bank %d pm_runtime_get_sync "
> + "failed\n", __func__, bank->id);
> + iounmap(bank->base);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
>
> if (bank->is_mpuio) {
> if (bank->regs->wkup_status)
> @@ -1034,6 +1070,13 @@ static int __devinit omap_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> omap_gpio_chip_init(bank);
> omap_gpio_show_rev(bank);
>
> + if (IS_ERR_VALUE(pm_runtime_put_sync(bank->dev)< 0)) {
> + dev_err(bank->dev, "%s: GPIO bank %d pm_runtime_put_sync "
> + "failed\n", __func__, bank->id);
> + iounmap(bank->base);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> list_add_tail(&bank->node,&omap_gpio_list);
>
> return ret;
> @@ -1044,7 +1087,7 @@ err_exit:
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static int omap_gpio_suspend(void)
> +static int omap_gpio_suspend(struct device *dev)
> {
> struct gpio_bank *bank;
>
> @@ -1063,12 +1106,13 @@ static int omap_gpio_suspend(void)
> _gpio_rmw(base, bank->regs->wkup_status,
> bank->suspend_wakeup, 1);
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank->lock, flags);
> + pm_runtime_put_sync(dev);
> }
>
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static void omap_gpio_resume(void)
> +static int omap_gpio_resume(struct device *dev)
> {
> struct gpio_bank *bank;
>
> @@ -1077,18 +1121,16 @@ static void omap_gpio_resume(void)
> unsigned long flags;
>
> if (!bank->regs->wkup_status)
> - return;
> + return 0;
>
> + pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
> spin_lock_irqsave(&bank->lock, flags);
> _gpio_rmw(base, bank->regs->wkup_status, bank->saved_wakeup, 1);
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank->lock, flags);
> }
> -}
>
> -static struct syscore_ops omap_gpio_syscore_ops = {
> - .suspend = omap_gpio_suspend,
> - .resume = omap_gpio_resume,
> -};
> + return 0;
> +}
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP2PLUS
>
> @@ -1112,6 +1154,11 @@ void omap2_gpio_prepare_for_idle(int off_mode)
> if (!off_mode)
> continue;
>
> + if (IS_ERR_VALUE(pm_runtime_put_sync(bank->dev)< 0))
> + dev_err(bank->dev, "%s: GPIO bank %d "
> + "pm_runtime_put_sync failed\n",
> + __func__, bank->id);
> +
> /* If going to OFF, remove triggering for all
> * non-wakeup GPIOs. Otherwise spurious IRQs will be
> * generated. See OMAP2420 Errata item 1.101. */
> @@ -1152,6 +1199,11 @@ void omap2_gpio_resume_after_idle(void)
> if (!bank->loses_context)
> continue;
>
> + if (IS_ERR_VALUE(pm_runtime_get_sync(bank->dev)< 0))
> + dev_err(bank->dev, "%s: GPIO bank %d "
> + "pm_runtime_get_sync failed\n",
> + __func__, bank->id);
> +
> for (j = 0; j< hweight_long(bank->dbck_enable_mask); j++)
> clk_enable(bank->dbck);
Optional clock handling also should been addressed using runtime hooks,
isn't it ?
We still seems to use clock framework here?
Regards
Santosh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-23 14:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-04 11:04 [PATCH v5 00/22] gpio/omap: driver cleanup and fixes Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-04 11:04 ` [PATCH v5 01/22] gpio/omap: remove dependency on gpio_bank_count Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-23 12:35 ` Santosh
2011-08-29 12:18 ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
2011-08-04 11:04 ` [PATCH v5 02/22] gpio/omap: use flag to identify wakeup domain Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-23 12:41 ` Santosh
2011-08-04 11:04 ` [PATCH v5 03/22] gpio/omap: make gpio_context part of gpio_bank structure Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-23 12:45 ` Santosh
2011-08-25 20:23 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-08-26 3:57 ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
2011-08-26 14:11 ` Santosh
2011-08-04 11:04 ` [PATCH v5 04/22] gpio/omap: fix pwrdm_post_transition call sequence Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-23 12:47 ` Santosh
2011-08-04 11:04 ` [PATCH v5 05/22] gpio/omap: handle save/restore ctx in GPIO driver Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-23 12:53 ` Santosh
2011-08-23 14:47 ` Santosh
2011-08-04 11:04 ` [PATCH v5 06/22] gpio/omap: make non-wakeup GPIO part of pdata Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-23 12:54 ` Santosh
2011-08-04 11:04 ` [PATCH v5 07/22] gpio/omap: avoid cpu checks during module ena/disable Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-23 12:57 ` Santosh
2011-08-04 11:04 ` [PATCH v5 08/22] gpio/omap: further cleanup using wakeup_status register Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-23 13:02 ` Santosh
2011-08-04 11:04 ` [PATCH v5 09/22] gpio/omap: cleanup omap1 related macros Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-23 13:04 ` Santosh
2011-08-04 11:04 ` [PATCH v5 10/22] gpio/omap: use level/edge detect reg offsets Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-23 13:08 ` Santosh
2011-08-04 11:04 ` [PATCH v5 11/22] gpio/omap: remove hardcoded offsets in ctxt save/restore Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-23 13:12 ` Santosh
2011-08-04 11:04 ` [PATCH v5 12/22] gpio/omap: cleanup set_gpio_triggering function Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-23 13:21 ` Santosh
2011-08-04 11:04 ` [PATCH v5 13/22] gpio/omap: cleanup omap_gpio_mod_init function Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-23 13:26 ` Santosh
2011-08-04 11:04 ` [PATCH v5 14/22] gpio/omap: use pinctrl offset instead of macro Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-23 13:27 ` Santosh
2011-08-04 11:04 ` [PATCH v5 15/22] gpio/omap: use readl in irq_handler for all access Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-23 14:25 ` Santosh
2011-08-04 11:04 ` [PATCH v5 16/22] gpio/omap: remove bank->method & METHOD_* macros Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-23 14:27 ` Santosh
2011-08-04 11:04 ` [PATCH v5 17/22] gpio/omap: fix bankwidth for OMAP7xx MPUIO Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-23 14:28 ` Santosh
2011-08-04 11:04 ` [PATCH v5 18/22] gpio/omap: use pm-runtime framework Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-23 14:34 ` Santosh [this message]
2011-08-24 4:02 ` Rajendra Nayak
2011-08-24 6:19 ` Santosh
2011-08-04 11:04 ` [PATCH v5 19/22] gpio/omap: optimize suspend and resume functions Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-23 14:35 ` Santosh
2011-08-04 11:04 ` [PATCH v5 20/22] gpio/omap: cleanup prepare_for_idle and resume_after_idle Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-23 14:40 ` Santosh
2011-08-04 11:04 ` [PATCH v5 21/22] gpio/omap: skip operations in runtime callbacks Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-23 14:41 ` Santosh
2011-08-04 11:04 ` [PATCH v5 22/22] gpio/omap: remove omap_gpio_save_context overhead Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-23 14:42 ` Santosh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E53BA80.7030200@ti.com \
--to=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).