From: shubhrajyoti@ti.com (Shubhrajyoti)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCHv6 2/3] OMAP: I2C: Remove the reset in the init path
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 15:04:29 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E5B5D25.3000903@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87pqjrydih.fsf@ti.com>
On Saturday 27 August 2011 04:41 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Shubhrajyoti D<shubhrajyoti@ti.com> writes:
>
>> - The reset in the driver at init is not needed anymore as the
>> hwmod framework takes care of reseting it.
>> - Reset is removed from omap_i2c_init, which was called
>> not only during probe, but also after time out and error handling.
>> device_reset were added in those places to effect the reset.
>> - Earlier the hwmod SYSC settings were over-written in the driver.
>> Removing the same and letting the hwmod take care of the settings.
>> - Clean up the SYSS_RESETDONE_MASK macro as it is no longer needed.
>> - Clean up the SYSCONFIG SYSC bit defination macros.
>> - Fix the typos in wakeup.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Shubhrajyoti D<shubhrajyoti@ti.com>
> I asked this in an earlier version, but here it is again.
>
> Are you sure a full IP reset is needed on the timeout and error
> conditions and not just the module-level one done by:
>
> omap_i2c_write_reg(dev, OMAP_I2C_CON_REG, 0);
>
> [ and later... ]
>
> /* Take the I2C module out of reset: */
> omap_i2c_write_reg(dev, OMAP_I2C_CON_REG, OMAP_I2C_CON_EN);
>
> I kind of suspect that the IP rese was done because the omap_i2c_init()
> function was callled under the timeout/error conditions, but that a full
> IP SW reset is a bit heavy handed.
My idea is that case of lockup in error path it could be helpful.
We internally had a discussion on this
https://gforge01.dal.design.ti.com/gf/project/opbu_mail_arcv/mailman/?action=ListThreads&mailman_id=218&_forum_action=ForumMessageBrowse&thread_id=12483
> Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-29 9:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-05 6:00 [PATCHv6 1/3] OMAP: I2C: Reset support Shubhrajyoti D
2011-08-05 6:00 ` [PATCHv6 2/3] OMAP: I2C: Remove the reset in the init path Shubhrajyoti D
2011-08-26 23:11 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-08-29 9:34 ` Shubhrajyoti [this message]
2011-08-05 6:00 ` [PATCHv6 3/3] OMAP: I2C: Remove the SYSC register definition Shubhrajyoti D
2011-08-26 23:06 ` [PATCHv6 1/3] OMAP: I2C: Reset support Kevin Hilman
2011-08-29 9:31 ` Shubhrajyoti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E5B5D25.3000903@ti.com \
--to=shubhrajyoti@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).