linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: b-cousson@ti.com (Cousson, Benoit)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/7] arm/dts: OMAP3: Add mpu and iva nodes
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 17:05:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E64E527.4040409@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1377915.IaVE5xAurc@wuerfel>

Hi Arnd,

On 9/1/2011 8:17 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 01 September 2011 19:25:07 Benoit Cousson wrote:
>>
>>          /*
>> +        * XXX: The cpus node is mandatory, but since the CPUs are as well part
>> +        * of the mpu subsystem below, it is not clear where the information
>> +        * should be. Maybe here with a phandle inside the mpu?
>> +        */
>> +       cpus {
>> +       };
>> +
>> +       /*
>>           * The soc node represents the soc top level view. It is uses for IPs
>>           * that are not memory mapped in the MPU view or for the MPU itself.
>>           */
>>          soc {
>>                  compatible = "ti,omap-infra";
>> +               mpu {
>> +                       compatible = "ti,omap3-mpu";
>> +                       hwmods = "mpu";
>> +                       cpu at 0 {
>> +                               compatible = "arm,cortex-a8";
>> +                       };
>> +               };
>> +
>
> I would always put the cpu nodes in the top-level, even if that's
> a slight misrepresentation of the truth. The point is basically
> that CPU nodes are special (you cannot have device drivers for them)
> and that the device tree is basically laid out from the perspective
> of the CPU, which may be different from the perspective that a
> hardware designer has.

Yeah, I saw that in the "cpus" node documentation. My point here is that 
I do need to represent the MPU subsystem that will contain the cpus. And 
thus the Cortex is inside the MPU subsystem.

I can potentially keep the CPUs inside the cpus node, and just represent 
the mpu node inside the soc, with potentially some phandle to the real 
cpu nodes.

Something like that:

cpus {
	cpu0: cpu at 0 {
			compatible = "arm,cortex-a8";
	};
};

[...]

soc {
	compatible = "ti,omap-infra";
	mpu {
		compatible = "ti,omap3-mpu";
		hwmods = "mpu";
		cpu at 0 {
			phandle = <&cpu0>;
			[...]
		};
	};
};


Does that look better?

Thanks,
Benoit

  reply	other threads:[~2011-09-05 15:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-01 17:25 [PATCH 0/7] OMAP3: Add basic DT support + i2c + twl Benoit Cousson
2011-09-01 17:25 ` [PATCH 1/7] arm/dts: Add initial device-tree support for OMAP3 SoC Benoit Cousson
2011-09-01 17:25 ` [PATCH 2/7] arm/dts: OMAP3: Add mpu and iva nodes Benoit Cousson
2011-09-01 18:17   ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-09-05 15:05     ` Cousson, Benoit [this message]
2011-09-05 17:23       ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-09-05 17:46         ` Mitch Bradley
2011-09-06  7:15           ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-09-01 17:25 ` [PATCH 3/7] arm/dts: OMAP3: Add i2c controllers nodes Benoit Cousson
2011-09-01 17:25 ` [PATCH 4/7] arm/dts: omap3-beagle: Include the generic omap3.dtsi Benoit Cousson
2011-09-01 17:25 ` [PATCH 5/7] arm/dts: omap3-beagle: Add twl4030 and EEPROM i2c devices Benoit Cousson
2011-09-01 17:25 ` [PATCH 6/7] OMAP3: board-dt: Add generic board file for DT support Benoit Cousson
2011-09-02  8:09   ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-02  8:46     ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-09-02  9:08       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-09-02  9:13         ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-09-02  9:21           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-09-02  9:34             ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-09-02 10:43       ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-02 11:43         ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-09-02 11:57           ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-02 12:20             ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-09-02 12:32               ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-05 12:09   ` G, Manjunath Kondaiah
2011-09-01 17:25 ` [PATCH 7/7] OMAP3: beagleboard: Remove DT support from regular board Benoit Cousson
2011-09-02  8:12   ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-02  8:59     ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-09-02 10:48       ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-02 12:35         ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-09-02 13:08           ` Tony Lindgren

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E64E527.4040409@ti.com \
    --to=b-cousson@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).