From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: nicolas.ferre@atmel.com (Nicolas Ferre) Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 11:22:08 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v3 2/2] at91: add Atmel ISI and ov2640 support on sam9m10/sam9g45 board. In-Reply-To: <20110924052609.GI29998@game.jcrosoft.org> References: <1316664661-11383-1-git-send-email-josh.wu@atmel.com> <1316664661-11383-2-git-send-email-josh.wu@atmel.com> <20110924052609.GI29998@game.jcrosoft.org> Message-ID: <4E804440.7030709@atmel.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Le 24/09/2011 07:26, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD : > On 09:35 Thu 22 Sep , Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: >> On Thu, 22 Sep 2011, Josh Wu wrote: >> >>> This patch >>> 1. add ISI_MCK parent setting code when add ISI device. >>> 2. add ov2640 support on board file. >>> 3. define isi_mck clock in sam9g45 chip file. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Josh Wu >>> --- >>> arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9g45.c | 3 + >>> arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9g45_devices.c | 105 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- >>> arch/arm/mach-at91/board-sam9m10g45ek.c | 85 ++++++++++++++++++++++++- >>> arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/board.h | 3 +- >> >> Personally, I think, it would be better to separate this into two patches >> at least: one for at91 core and one for the specific board, but that's up >> to arch maintainers to decide. >> >> You also want to patch arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9263_devices.c, don't >> you? > agreed No, I am not sure. The IP is not the same between 9263 and 9g45/9m10. So this inclusion will not apply. Best regards, -- Nicolas Ferre