* [PATCH] dma/imx-sdma+imx-dma: explicitly #include <linux/module.h> @ 2011-09-26 6:26 Uwe Kleine-König 2011-09-27 22:03 ` Paul Gortmaker 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Uwe Kleine-König @ 2011-09-26 6:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel This is needed after commit include: replace linux/module.h with "struct module" wherever possible (currently 25215aa in next). Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-K?nig <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> --- Hello, maybe it's sensible for Paul to take that before his commit? Best regards Uwe drivers/dma/imx-dma.c | 1 + drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/dma/imx-dma.c b/drivers/dma/imx-dma.c index d99f71c..3732de8 100644 --- a/drivers/dma/imx-dma.c +++ b/drivers/dma/imx-dma.c @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ #include <linux/slab.h> #include <linux/platform_device.h> #include <linux/dmaengine.h> +#include <linux/module.h> #include <asm/irq.h> #include <mach/dma-v1.h> diff --git a/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c b/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c index b5cc27d..86fb6e5 100644 --- a/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c +++ b/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ #include <linux/dmaengine.h> #include <linux/of.h> #include <linux/of_device.h> +#include <linux/module.h> #include <asm/irq.h> #include <mach/sdma.h> -- 1.7.6.3 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] dma/imx-sdma+imx-dma: explicitly #include <linux/module.h> 2011-09-26 6:26 [PATCH] dma/imx-sdma+imx-dma: explicitly #include <linux/module.h> Uwe Kleine-König @ 2011-09-27 22:03 ` Paul Gortmaker 2011-09-28 3:49 ` Vinod Koul 2011-09-28 6:46 ` Uwe Kleine-König 0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Paul Gortmaker @ 2011-09-27 22:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On 11-09-26 02:26 AM, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote: > This is needed after commit > > include: replace linux/module.h with "struct module" wherever possible > > (currently 25215aa in next). > > Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-K?nig <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> > --- > Hello, > > maybe it's sensible for Paul to take that before his commit? Thanks, I'll blend it into the commit adding module.h to the other drivers/dma files. It seems the imx boards don't have a defconfig in the arch/arm/configs that enables this (CONFIG_IMX_[S]DMA). What is really interesting (at least to me anyway) is that I didn't get one iMX build in some 6000+ ARM randconfig builds.... I would have thought it would have showed up at least a couple times, given that number of builds. Maybe randconfig doesn't deal so well with "choice" Kconfig items? ~/git/module.h/linux-2.6.git$ ls -1 ../build-10*arm |wc -l 6399 ~/git/module.h/linux-2.6.git$ grep CONFIG_ARCH_[A-Z0-9]*=y ../build-10*arm*/.config | sed 's/.*CON/CON/'|sort |uniq CONFIG_ARCH_EBSA110=y CONFIG_ARCH_H7201=y CONFIG_ARCH_H7202=y CONFIG_ARCH_H720X=y CONFIG_ARCH_VERSATILE=y ~/git/module.h/linux-2.6.git$ No ARCH_MXC, no ARCH_MXS, PXA, or any of the other 20+ variants. Definitely not a random spread there, with all 6000 builds falling in just 5 buckets. Paul. > > Best regards > Uwe > > drivers/dma/imx-dma.c | 1 + > drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c | 1 + > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/dma/imx-dma.c b/drivers/dma/imx-dma.c > index d99f71c..3732de8 100644 > --- a/drivers/dma/imx-dma.c > +++ b/drivers/dma/imx-dma.c > @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ > #include <linux/slab.h> > #include <linux/platform_device.h> > #include <linux/dmaengine.h> > +#include <linux/module.h> > > #include <asm/irq.h> > #include <mach/dma-v1.h> > diff --git a/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c b/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c > index b5cc27d..86fb6e5 100644 > --- a/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c > +++ b/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c > @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ > #include <linux/dmaengine.h> > #include <linux/of.h> > #include <linux/of_device.h> > +#include <linux/module.h> > > #include <asm/irq.h> > #include <mach/sdma.h> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] dma/imx-sdma+imx-dma: explicitly #include <linux/module.h> 2011-09-27 22:03 ` Paul Gortmaker @ 2011-09-28 3:49 ` Vinod Koul 2011-09-28 6:46 ` Uwe Kleine-König 1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Vinod Koul @ 2011-09-28 3:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 18:03 -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote: > On 11-09-26 02:26 AM, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote: > > This is needed after commit > > > > include: replace linux/module.h with "struct module" wherever possible > > > > (currently 25215aa in next). > > > > Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-K?nig <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Acked-by Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com> > > --- > > Hello, > > > > maybe it's sensible for Paul to take that before his commit? > > Thanks, I'll blend it into the commit adding module.h to the other > drivers/dma files. It seems the imx boards don't have a defconfig > in the arch/arm/configs that enables this (CONFIG_IMX_[S]DMA). You can find imx_v4_v5_defconfig in linux-next tree. > > What is really interesting (at least to me anyway) is that I > didn't get one iMX build in some 6000+ ARM randconfig builds.... > > I would have thought it would have showed up at least a couple > times, given that number of builds. Maybe randconfig doesn't > deal so well with "choice" Kconfig items? > > ~/git/module.h/linux-2.6.git$ ls -1 ../build-10*arm |wc -l > 6399 > ~/git/module.h/linux-2.6.git$ grep CONFIG_ARCH_[A-Z0-9]*=y ../build-10*arm*/.config | sed 's/.*CON/CON/'|sort |uniq > CONFIG_ARCH_EBSA110=y > CONFIG_ARCH_H7201=y > CONFIG_ARCH_H7202=y > CONFIG_ARCH_H720X=y > CONFIG_ARCH_VERSATILE=y > ~/git/module.h/linux-2.6.git$ > > No ARCH_MXC, no ARCH_MXS, PXA, or any of the other 20+ variants. > Definitely not a random spread there, with all 6000 builds falling > in just 5 buckets. > > Paul. > > > > > > Best regards > > Uwe > > > > drivers/dma/imx-dma.c | 1 + > > drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c | 1 + > > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/dma/imx-dma.c b/drivers/dma/imx-dma.c > > index d99f71c..3732de8 100644 > > --- a/drivers/dma/imx-dma.c > > +++ b/drivers/dma/imx-dma.c > > @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ > > #include <linux/slab.h> > > #include <linux/platform_device.h> > > #include <linux/dmaengine.h> > > +#include <linux/module.h> > > > > #include <asm/irq.h> > > #include <mach/dma-v1.h> > > diff --git a/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c b/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c > > index b5cc27d..86fb6e5 100644 > > --- a/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c > > +++ b/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c > > @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ > > #include <linux/dmaengine.h> > > #include <linux/of.h> > > #include <linux/of_device.h> > > +#include <linux/module.h> > > > > #include <asm/irq.h> > > #include <mach/sdma.h> -- ~Vinod ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] dma/imx-sdma+imx-dma: explicitly #include <linux/module.h> 2011-09-27 22:03 ` Paul Gortmaker 2011-09-28 3:49 ` Vinod Koul @ 2011-09-28 6:46 ` Uwe Kleine-König 2011-09-28 7:34 ` Arnaud Lacombe 2011-09-28 13:36 ` Paul Gortmaker 1 sibling, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Uwe Kleine-König @ 2011-09-28 6:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel [Cc: += linux-kbuild at v.k.o + Michal Marek] Hello, On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 06:03:13PM -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote: > On 11-09-26 02:26 AM, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote: > > This is needed after commit > > > > include: replace linux/module.h with "struct module" wherever possible > > > > (currently 25215aa in next). > > > > Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-K?nig <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> > > --- > > Hello, > > > > maybe it's sensible for Paul to take that before his commit? > > Thanks, I'll blend it into the commit adding module.h to the other > drivers/dma files. It seems the imx boards don't have a defconfig > in the arch/arm/configs that enables this (CONFIG_IMX_[S]DMA). > > What is really interesting (at least to me anyway) is that I > didn't get one iMX build in some 6000+ ARM randconfig builds.... > > I would have thought it would have showed up at least a couple > times, given that number of builds. Maybe randconfig doesn't > deal so well with "choice" Kconfig items? > > ~/git/module.h/linux-2.6.git$ ls -1 ../build-10*arm |wc -l > 6399 > ~/git/module.h/linux-2.6.git$ grep CONFIG_ARCH_[A-Z0-9]*=y ../build-10*arm*/.config | sed 's/.*CON/CON/'|sort |uniq > CONFIG_ARCH_EBSA110=y > CONFIG_ARCH_H7201=y > CONFIG_ARCH_H7202=y > CONFIG_ARCH_H720X=y > CONFIG_ARCH_VERSATILE=y I don't understand why you did that sed, but AFAICT it doesn't hurt, too. Maybe adding -c to uniq in your command line is interesting for the kbuild people?! > ~/git/module.h/linux-2.6.git$ > > No ARCH_MXC, no ARCH_MXS, PXA, or any of the other 20+ variants. > Definitely not a random spread there, with all 6000 builds falling > in just 5 buckets. How did you test? Generate a .config, test without your change and if that succeeds test with it? If so, maybe the problem isn't that randconfig doesn't generate more random configs but that you got many failures in the first run?! Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-K?nig | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] dma/imx-sdma+imx-dma: explicitly #include <linux/module.h> 2011-09-28 6:46 ` Uwe Kleine-König @ 2011-09-28 7:34 ` Arnaud Lacombe 2011-09-28 13:36 ` Paul Gortmaker 1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Arnaud Lacombe @ 2011-09-28 7:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel Hi, 2011/9/28 Uwe Kleine-K?nig <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>: > [Cc: += linux-kbuild at v.k.o + Michal Marek] > > Hello, > > On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 06:03:13PM -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote: >> On 11-09-26 02:26 AM, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote: >> > This is needed after commit >> > >> > ? ? include: replace linux/module.h with "struct module" wherever possible >> > >> > (currently 25215aa in next). >> > >> > Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> >> > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-K?nig <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> >> > --- >> > Hello, >> > >> > maybe it's sensible for Paul to take that before his commit? >> >> Thanks, I'll blend it into the commit adding module.h to the other >> drivers/dma files. ?It seems the imx boards don't have a defconfig >> in the arch/arm/configs that enables this (CONFIG_IMX_[S]DMA). >> >> What is really interesting (at least to me anyway) is that I >> didn't get one iMX build in some 6000+ ARM randconfig builds.... >> >> I would have thought it would have showed up at least a couple >> times, given that number of builds. ?Maybe randconfig doesn't >> deal so well with "choice" Kconfig items? >> >> ~/git/module.h/linux-2.6.git$ ls -1 ../build-10*arm |wc -l >> 6399 >> ~/git/module.h/linux-2.6.git$ grep CONFIG_ARCH_[A-Z0-9]*=y ../build-10*arm*/.config | sed 's/.*CON/CON/'|sort |uniq >> CONFIG_ARCH_EBSA110=y >> CONFIG_ARCH_H7201=y >> CONFIG_ARCH_H7202=y >> CONFIG_ARCH_H720X=y >> CONFIG_ARCH_VERSATILE=y > > I don't understand why you did that sed, but AFAICT it doesn't hurt, > too. Maybe adding -c to uniq in your command line is interesting for the > kbuild people?! > this can be reproduced trivially: for i in $(seq 1 100); do make ARCH=arm randconfig sed -e '/CONFIG_ARCH_INTEGRATOR/,/CONFIG_ARCH_ZYNQ/!d;' \ -e '/=y/!d' .config >> arch_selected done sort arch_selected | uniq -c I may have a trivial explanation for part of the symbol, which depends on MMU, so if these symbols are selected, but MMU is not, it will fall-back on the default, VERSATILE, which should happen 50% of the time. However, there is plenty of symbols which have no specific dependency, and are still not selected. On the other side, all the result of a randconfig, on the choice alone (ie. without any 'select' and any other symbols) is spread "correctly". Taken as a whole: % cat arch_selected | sort | uniq -c | wc -l 3 % cat arch_selected | sort | uniq -c 2 CONFIG_ARCH_EBSA110=y 4 CONFIG_ARCH_H720X=y 100 CONFIG_ARCH_VERSATILE=y However, when the choice is alone: % cat arch_selected | sort | uniq -c | wc -l 39 >> ~/git/module.h/linux-2.6.git$ >> >> No ARCH_MXC, no ARCH_MXS, PXA, or any of the other 20+ variants. >> Definitely not a random spread there, with all 6000 builds falling >> in just 5 buckets. > How did you test? Generate a .config, test without your change and if > that succeeds test with it? If so, maybe the problem isn't that > randconfig doesn't generate more random configs but that you got many > failures in the first run?! > it would seem that taken globally, the result of this particular choice is not random, but I'm not sure of the dynamic involved precisely. I'm not a huge fan of the way randconfig works presently, that it by just iterating over all symbols and setting a value . I'd prefer to keep traversing all the menu, picking a random value for user-changeable setting, over and over until all symbol have been chosen. However, this is a whole lots of change... - Arnaud > Best regards > Uwe > > -- > Pengutronix e.K. ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? | Uwe Kleine-K?nig ? ? ? ? ? ?| > Industrial Linux Solutions ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? | http://www.pengutronix.de/ ?| > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at ?http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at ?http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] dma/imx-sdma+imx-dma: explicitly #include <linux/module.h> 2011-09-28 6:46 ` Uwe Kleine-König 2011-09-28 7:34 ` Arnaud Lacombe @ 2011-09-28 13:36 ` Paul Gortmaker 1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Paul Gortmaker @ 2011-09-28 13:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On 11-09-28 02:46 AM, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote: > [Cc: += linux-kbuild at v.k.o + Michal Marek] > > Hello, > > On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 06:03:13PM -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote: >> On 11-09-26 02:26 AM, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote: >>> This is needed after commit >>> >>> include: replace linux/module.h with "struct module" wherever possible >>> >>> (currently 25215aa in next). >>> >>> Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> >>> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-K?nig <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> >>> --- >>> Hello, >>> >>> maybe it's sensible for Paul to take that before his commit? >> >> Thanks, I'll blend it into the commit adding module.h to the other >> drivers/dma files. It seems the imx boards don't have a defconfig >> in the arch/arm/configs that enables this (CONFIG_IMX_[S]DMA). >> >> What is really interesting (at least to me anyway) is that I >> didn't get one iMX build in some 6000+ ARM randconfig builds.... >> >> I would have thought it would have showed up at least a couple >> times, given that number of builds. Maybe randconfig doesn't >> deal so well with "choice" Kconfig items? >> >> ~/git/module.h/linux-2.6.git$ ls -1 ../build-10*arm |wc -l >> 6399 >> ~/git/module.h/linux-2.6.git$ grep CONFIG_ARCH_[A-Z0-9]*=y ../build-10*arm*/.config | sed 's/.*CON/CON/'|sort |uniq >> CONFIG_ARCH_EBSA110=y >> CONFIG_ARCH_H7201=y >> CONFIG_ARCH_H7202=y >> CONFIG_ARCH_H720X=y >> CONFIG_ARCH_VERSATILE=y > > I don't understand why you did that sed, but AFAICT it doesn't hurt, > too. Maybe adding -c to uniq in your command line is interesting for the > kbuild people?! The sed was to strip the build paths from the grep output. I could have used "grep -h" instead. > >> ~/git/module.h/linux-2.6.git$ >> >> No ARCH_MXC, no ARCH_MXS, PXA, or any of the other 20+ variants. >> Definitely not a random spread there, with all 6000 builds falling >> in just 5 buckets. > How did you test? Generate a .config, test without your change and if > that succeeds test with it? If so, maybe the problem isn't that > randconfig doesn't generate more random configs but that you got many > failures in the first run?! Testing was with the following chunk out of my $0.02 script: i=10000 ; while [ 1 ] ; do D=../build-$i-$MYARCH ; mkdir $D ; echo xxxxxxx $D xxxxxx ; make ARCH=$MYARCH O=$D randconfig > $D/cfg.log 2>&1 ; if [ $? != 0 ] ; then echo cfg failed in $D ; break ; fi ; time make ARCH=$MYARCH O=$D -j16 > $D/build.log 2>&1 ; if [ $? != 0 ]; then echo bld fail in $D ; fi ; i=$[$i+1] ; done Then I'd comb all the build logs looking for errors that were caused by changes that I made. As you can see, it just calls randconfig, but the coverage never really "randomly" covered all arm platforms. Paul. > > Best regards > Uwe > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-09-28 13:36 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2011-09-26 6:26 [PATCH] dma/imx-sdma+imx-dma: explicitly #include <linux/module.h> Uwe Kleine-König 2011-09-27 22:03 ` Paul Gortmaker 2011-09-28 3:49 ` Vinod Koul 2011-09-28 6:46 ` Uwe Kleine-König 2011-09-28 7:34 ` Arnaud Lacombe 2011-09-28 13:36 ` Paul Gortmaker
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).