From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: adrian.hunter@intel.com (Adrian Hunter)
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 13:33:47 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] mmc: mmci: Do not release spinlock in request_end
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdb5pn=q+hQSsrTgKbCvuKR83vHn1iAfvzMFXQeAgv--+Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1318342001-26955-1-git-send-email-ulf.hansson@stericsson.com>
	<CACRpkdb5pn=q+hQSsrTgKbCvuKR83vHn1iAfvzMFXQeAgv--+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4E956D0B.8060803@intel.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 12/10/11 12:41, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@stericsson.com> wrote:
> 
>> The patch "mmc: core: move ->request() call from atomic context",
>> is the reason to why this change is possible. This simplifies the
>> error handling code execution path quite a lot and potentially also
>> fixes some error handling hang problems.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@stericsson.com>
> 
> Adrian do you agree with this?

Yes

> 
> To me it looks correct,
> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> 
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij