From: lars@metafoo.de (Lars-Peter Clausen)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] ARM: AT91: IIO: Add AT91 ADC driver.
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 09:09:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E9FC916.2070800@metafoo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1319041134-19712-3-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
On 10/19/2011 06:18 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
> Cc: Patrice Vilchez <patrice.vilchez@atmel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
> ---
> [...]
> +
> +#define at91adc_reg_read(base, reg) __raw_readl((base) + (reg))
> +#define at91adc_reg_write(base, reg, val) __raw_writel((val), (base) + (reg))
Shouldn't this rather be {readl,writel}_relaxed?
> +
> +struct at91adc_state {
> + struct clk *clk;
> + bool done;
> + struct mutex lock;
> + struct iio_chan_spec *channels;
> + int nb_chan;
> + int irq;
> + wait_queue_head_t wq_data_avail;
> + u16 lcdr;
> + void __iomem *reg_base;
> +
> +};
> +
> +static irqreturn_t at91adc_eoc_trigger(int irq, void *private)
> +{
> + int chan;
> + struct at91adc_state *st = private;
> + struct iio_dev *idev = iio_priv_to_dev(st);
> + unsigned int status = at91adc_reg_read(st->reg_base, AT91_ADC_SR);
> +
> + if (!(status & AT91_ADC_DRDY))
> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +
> + for (chan = 0; chan < st->nb_chan; chan++) {
> + if (status & AT91_ADC_EOC(chan)) {
> + st->done = true;
> + st->lcdr = at91adc_reg_read(st->reg_base,
> + AT91_ADC_CHR(chan));
> + }
> + }
> + wake_up_interruptible(&st->wq_data_avail);
> +
> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +}
> +
> +static int at91adc_channel_init(struct at91adc_state *st)
> +{
> + int ret = 0, i;
> + st->channels = kzalloc(sizeof(struct iio_chan_spec) * st->nb_chan,
> + GFP_KERNEL);
kcalloc
> + if (st->channels == NULL)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < st->nb_chan; i++) {
> + struct iio_chan_spec *chan = st->channels + i;
> + chan->type = IIO_VOLTAGE;
> + chan->indexed = 1;
> + chan->channel = i;
It probably makes sense to initialize scan_type as well.
> + ++ret;
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
Why do you need ret? Shouldn't this be just st->nb_chan?
> +}
> +
> +static int at91adc_read_raw(struct iio_dev *idev,
> + struct iio_chan_spec const *chan,
> + int *val, int *val2, long mask)
> +{
> + struct at91adc_state *st = iio_priv(idev);
> +
> + switch (mask) {
> + case 0:
> + mutex_lock(&st->lock);
> +
> + at91adc_reg_write(st->reg_base, AT91_ADC_CHER,
> + AT91_ADC_CH(chan->channel));
> + at91adc_reg_write(st->reg_base, AT91_ADC_IER,
> + AT91_ADC_EOC(chan->channel));
> + at91adc_reg_write(st->reg_base, AT91_ADC_CR, AT91_ADC_START);
> +
> + wait_event_interruptible(st->wq_data_avail, st->done);
Its probably a good idea to add a timeout in case there is a problem with
the hardware.
> + *val = st->lcdr;
> +
> + at91adc_reg_write(st->reg_base, AT91_ADC_CHDR,
> + AT91_ADC_CH(chan->channel));
> + at91adc_reg_write(st->reg_base, AT91_ADC_IDR,
> + AT91_ADC_EOC(chan->channel));
> +
> + st->lcdr = 0;
> + st->done = false;
> + mutex_unlock(&st->lock);
> + return IIO_VAL_INT;
> + default:
> + break;
> + }
> + return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct iio_info at91adc_info = {
> + .driver_module = THIS_MODULE,
> + .read_raw = &at91adc_read_raw,
> +};
> +
> +static int __devinit at91adc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + unsigned int prsc, mstrclk, ticks;
> + int ret;
> + struct iio_dev *idev;
> + struct at91adc_state *st;
> + struct resource *res;
> + struct at91_adc_data *pdata = pdev->dev.platform_data;
> +
> + dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "AT91ADC probed\n");
> +
> + res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> + if (!res) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "No resource defined\n");
> + ret = -ENXIO;
> + goto error_ret;
> + }
> +
> + idev = iio_allocate_device(sizeof(*st));
> + if (idev == NULL) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to allocate memory.\n");
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto error_ret;
> + }
> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, idev);
> +
> + idev->dev.parent = &pdev->dev;
> + idev->name = platform_get_device_id(pdev)->name;
You don't use device ids. This should cause a NULL pointer deref? Maybe use
dev_name(&pdev->dev) instead.
> + idev->modes = INDIO_DIRECT_MODE;
> + idev->info = &at91adc_info;
> +
> +[...]
> +}
> +
> +static int __devexit at91adc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct iio_dev *idev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> + struct resource *res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> + struct at91adc_state *st = iio_priv(idev);
> +
> + free_irq(st->irq, st);
> + iounmap(st->reg_base);
> + release_mem_region(res->start, resource_size(res));
> + iio_device_unregister(idev);
> +
The iio API changed a bit recently and uses a two stage unregistration now.
You should call iio_device_unregister before freeing resources and
iio_device_free afterwards.
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> [...]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-20 7:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 75+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-19 16:18 [PATCH] AT91: Add a driver for the ADC Maxime Ripard
2011-10-19 16:18 ` [PATCH 1/3] ARM: AT91: Add platform data for the ADCs Maxime Ripard
2011-10-19 16:18 ` [PATCH 2/3] ARM: AT91: IIO: Add AT91 ADC driver Maxime Ripard
2011-10-19 16:42 ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-10-19 18:23 ` Maxime Ripard
2011-10-20 7:05 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2011-10-20 8:33 ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-10-20 8:49 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2011-10-20 9:19 ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-10-20 9:52 ` Mark Brown
2011-10-20 7:09 ` Lars-Peter Clausen [this message]
2011-10-21 17:54 ` Maxime Ripard
2011-10-21 17:55 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2011-10-23 9:08 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2011-10-24 8:21 ` Maxime Ripard
2011-10-19 16:18 ` [PATCH 3/3] ARM: AT91: Add the ADC to the sam9g20ek board Maxime Ripard
2011-10-20 6:28 ` Alexander Stein
2011-10-21 17:47 ` Maxime Ripard
2011-10-20 7:14 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2011-11-03 10:11 ` [PATCHv2] AT91: Add a driver for the ADC Maxime Ripard
2011-11-03 10:11 ` [PATCH 1/3] ARM: AT91: Add platform data for the ADCs Maxime Ripard
2011-11-03 11:27 ` Linus Walleij
2011-11-03 16:27 ` Maxime Ripard
2011-11-03 16:38 ` Linus Walleij
2011-11-03 18:05 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2011-11-04 10:27 ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-11-04 10:36 ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-11-04 10:34 ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-11-04 15:22 ` Maxime Ripard
2011-11-04 16:28 ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-11-03 10:11 ` [PATCH 2/3] ARM: AT91: IIO: Add AT91 ADC driver Maxime Ripard
2011-11-04 10:27 ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-11-04 16:29 ` Maxime Ripard
2011-11-04 16:40 ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-11-03 10:11 ` [PATCH 3/3] ARM: AT91: Add the ADC to the sam9g20ek board Maxime Ripard
2011-11-04 10:33 ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-11-04 11:25 ` Maxime Ripard
2011-11-04 15:52 ` Linus Walleij
2011-11-04 16:32 ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-11-07 16:08 ` [PATCHv3] AT91: Add a driver for the ADC Maxime Ripard
2011-11-07 16:08 ` [PATCH 1/3] ARM: AT91: Add platform data for the ADCs Maxime Ripard
2011-11-07 16:27 ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-11-08 13:19 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2011-11-07 16:08 ` [PATCH 2/3] ARM: AT91: IIO: Add AT91 ADC driver Maxime Ripard
2011-11-08 13:30 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2011-11-07 16:08 ` [PATCH 3/3] ARM: AT91: Add the ADC to the sam9g20ek board Maxime Ripard
2011-11-09 10:19 ` [PATCHv4] AT91: Add a driver for the ADC Maxime Ripard
2011-11-09 10:19 ` [PATCH 1/3] ARM: AT91: Add platform data for the ADCs Maxime Ripard
2011-11-09 10:19 ` [PATCH 2/3] ARM: AT91: IIO: Add AT91 ADC driver Maxime Ripard
2011-11-10 17:35 ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-11-11 12:34 ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-11-14 9:59 ` Maxime Ripard
2011-11-14 9:06 ` Maxime Ripard
2011-11-09 10:19 ` [PATCH 3/3] ARM: AT91: Add the ADC to the sam9g20ek board Maxime Ripard
2011-11-10 17:37 ` Jonathan Cameron
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-11-14 10:06 [PATCHv5] AT91: Add a driver for the ADC Maxime Ripard
2011-11-14 10:06 ` [PATCH 2/3] ARM: AT91: IIO: Add AT91 ADC driver Maxime Ripard
2011-11-14 11:30 ` Nicolas Ferre
2011-11-14 11:37 ` Marek Vasut
2011-11-14 14:23 ` Maxime Ripard
2011-11-14 17:30 [PATCH v6] AT91: Add a driver for the ADC Maxime Ripard
2011-11-14 17:30 ` [PATCH 2/3] ARM: AT91: IIO: Add AT91 ADC driver Maxime Ripard
2011-11-14 21:32 ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-11-15 10:23 ` Maxime Ripard
2011-11-15 10:54 [PATCH v7] AT91: Add a driver for the ADC Maxime Ripard
2011-11-15 10:54 ` [PATCH 2/3] ARM: AT91: IIO: Add AT91 ADC driver Maxime Ripard
2011-11-16 15:39 ` Maxime Ripard
2011-11-18 10:12 [PATCH v8] AT91: Add a driver for the ADC Maxime Ripard
2011-11-18 10:12 ` [PATCH 2/3] ARM: AT91: IIO: Add AT91 ADC driver Maxime Ripard
2011-11-24 11:27 [PATCH v9] AT91: Add a driver for the ADC Maxime Ripard
2011-11-24 11:27 ` [PATCH 2/3] ARM: AT91: IIO: Add AT91 ADC driver Maxime Ripard
2011-11-24 14:28 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2011-11-30 9:14 [PATCH v11] AT91: Add a driver for the ADC Maxime Ripard
2011-11-30 9:15 ` [PATCH 2/3] ARM: AT91: IIO: Add AT91 ADC driver Maxime Ripard
2011-11-30 17:40 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-12-02 13:17 [PATCH v12] AT91: Add a driver for the ADC Maxime Ripard
2011-12-02 13:17 ` [PATCH 2/3] ARM: AT91: IIO: Add AT91 ADC driver Maxime Ripard
2011-12-14 10:01 [PATCH v13] AT91: Add a driver for the ADC Maxime Ripard
2011-12-14 10:01 ` [PATCH 2/3] ARM: AT91: IIO: Add AT91 ADC driver Maxime Ripard
2012-01-16 21:36 [PATCH RESEND v13] AT91: Add a driver for the ADC Maxime Ripard
2012-01-16 21:36 ` [PATCH 2/3] ARM: AT91: IIO: Add AT91 ADC driver Maxime Ripard
2012-01-17 17:35 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-01-17 19:08 ` Maxime Ripard
2012-01-18 10:27 ` Nicolas Ferre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E9FC916.2070800@metafoo.de \
--to=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).