From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: robherring2@gmail.com (Rob Herring)
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 09:48:24 -0500
Subject: [GIT PULL] DEBUG_LL platform updates for 3.2
In-Reply-To: <20111021105941.GE30168@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com>
References: <20110928103815.GA8344@e102144-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
	<20111017082506.GC21648@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
	<20111017092342.GB2459@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com>
	<201110201657.51810.arnd@arndb.de>
	<20111021105941.GE30168@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com>
Message-ID: <4EA18638.6020809@gmail.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 10/21/2011 05:59 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi Arnd,
> 
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 03:57:49PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> Ok, thanks a lot. I've updated my branches now and recreated
>> the for-next branch with these. Can you have a look to make sure
>> that everything looks good there now?
> 
> The cpu mapping and debug-ll stuff all looks good to me, thanks. On the
> downside, I'm seeing a couple of problems with your for-next branch:
> 
> 1. I can't compile if !CONFIG_OF, because l2x0_init isn't declared in
>    cache-l2x0.h. There seems to be some broken ifdeffery because of
>    what looks like duplicate commits d94527dd and 5260f15b, although
>    they are slightly different (and actually, both look broken to me
>    anyway!).
> 

This was caught in linux-next.


> 2. The GIC is hosed on versatile express. Reverting e3f14d3 ("ARM: gic: add
>    OF based initialization") and 2071a2a4 ("ARM: gic: add irq_domain support")
>    allows me to boot again.
> 

I'll take a look at it today. Do you have more details or a boot log?

Rob