linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ulf.hansson@stericsson.com (Ulf Hansson)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] mmc: mmci: Improve runtime PM support
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 13:48:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EA55076.2010701@stericsson.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111024101416.GK9893@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>

>> Could you maybe elaborate a bit of how the power is controlled in the  
>> ARM dev boards? Would it be possible to control such a switch in "GPIO"  
>> manner instead? For example via the vdd_handler or similar?
>>
>> I will also think if and see if is feasible to re-design and see if this  
>> hole feature can be controlled by the variant struct instead. My feeling  
>> is although it can be kind of messy. But let's see...
> 
> The MCIPWR register contains two bits to control _the_ _power_ _state_.
> See Table A-4: the MCIPWR signal.  See section 2.2.2.  See section 3.3.1.
> 
> The MCIPWR signal controls the external power switch.  This is the only
> signal for it.  This is the only connection for it.  There is no other
> control form for this power switch.
> 

Then we are only left to use the variant struct I believe. In principle, 
a flag in the variant struct, could indicate whether it is OK to disable 
the vcore regulator and thus clear the MCIPWR when doing runtime_suspend.

How do you feel about this kind of approach to find a solution?

BR
Ulf Hansson

  reply	other threads:[~2011-10-24 11:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-10-21 15:25 [PATCH] mmc: mmci: Improve runtime PM support Ulf Hansson
2011-10-21 17:36 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
     [not found]   ` <CAKnu2MrOriMzJH9NcwUivWa0cinASa6wrRf4a69si4WUs-aTrQ@mail.gmail.com>
2011-10-23  0:31     ` Sebastian Rasmussen
2011-10-24  8:05       ` Ulf Hansson
2011-10-24  9:04         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-10-24  9:36           ` Ulf Hansson
2011-10-24  9:42             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-10-24 10:06               ` Ulf Hansson
2011-10-24 10:14                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-10-24 11:48                   ` Ulf Hansson [this message]
2011-10-24 12:18                     ` Linus Walleij
2011-10-24 15:25                       ` Ulf Hansson
2011-10-24 15:34                         ` Ulf Hansson
2011-10-25  7:12                         ` Linus Walleij
2011-10-25  7:39                           ` Ulf Hansson
2011-10-24  9:11         ` Sebastian Rasmussen
2011-10-24  9:14         ` Linus Walleij
2011-10-24  9:36       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-10-24  9:54         ` Linus Walleij
2011-10-24  9:56           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-10-24 10:17             ` Ulf Hansson
2011-10-24 11:49               ` Linus Walleij
2011-10-25  8:05             ` Adrian Hunter
2011-10-25  8:53               ` Linus Walleij

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4EA55076.2010701@stericsson.com \
    --to=ulf.hansson@stericsson.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).