linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* arm-soc samsung patches blocked on dmaengine patches
@ 2011-11-04 13:00 Arnd Bergmann
  2011-11-04 13:06 ` Koul, Vinod
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2011-11-04 13:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

Hi Vinod and Kukjin,

Right now, all the patches from the arm-soc tree are merged into 3.2, but the
samsung/cleanup and samsung/devel series are missing because they depend on
patches in the dmaengine tree. I'm not sure about the status of that tree,
but I didn't see a pull request for them yet.

Should I just submit the samsung tree with the dmaengine patches included,
or keep waiting?

	Arnd

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* arm-soc samsung patches blocked on dmaengine patches
  2011-11-04 13:00 arm-soc samsung patches blocked on dmaengine patches Arnd Bergmann
@ 2011-11-04 13:06 ` Koul, Vinod
  2011-11-04 13:17   ` Kukjin Kim
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Koul, Vinod @ 2011-11-04 13:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

> Hi Vinod and Kukjin,
> 
> Right now, all the patches from the arm-soc tree are merged into 3.2, but the
> samsung/cleanup and samsung/devel series are missing because they depend on
> patches in the dmaengine tree. I'm not sure about the status of that tree,
> but I didn't see a pull request for them yet.
> 
> Should I just submit the samsung tree with the dmaengine patches included,
> or keep waiting?
> 
Arnd,

I have already sent pull request to Linus on Monday[1], still waiting for
these to get merged

--
~Vinod

[1]: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1209052

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* arm-soc samsung patches blocked on dmaengine patches
  2011-11-04 13:06 ` Koul, Vinod
@ 2011-11-04 13:17   ` Kukjin Kim
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Kukjin Kim @ 2011-11-04 13:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

On 11/04/11 22:06, Koul, Vinod wrote:
>> Hi Vinod and Kukjin,
>>
>> Right now, all the patches from the arm-soc tree are merged into 3.2, but the
>> samsung/cleanup and samsung/devel series are missing because they depend on
>> patches in the dmaengine tree. I'm not sure about the status of that tree,
>> but I didn't see a pull request for them yet.
>>
>> Should I just submit the samsung tree with the dmaengine patches included,
>> or keep waiting?
>>
> Arnd,
>
> I have already sent pull request to Linus on Monday[1], still waiting for
> these to get merged
>
Arnd,

So I think you can send them to Linus.

And as a note, I sent next-samsung-devel-4 which includes supporting 
EXYNOS4 DT and reorganization mach-exynos and something to you. I hope 
you can pick them up with others too. If any problems, please let me know.

Thanks.

Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>, Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-11-04 13:17 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-11-04 13:00 arm-soc samsung patches blocked on dmaengine patches Arnd Bergmann
2011-11-04 13:06 ` Koul, Vinod
2011-11-04 13:17   ` Kukjin Kim

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).