From: marc.zyngier@arm.com (Marc Zyngier)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCHv4 02/13] ARM: vic: device tree binding
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 15:20:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EBBEBD3.8090001@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111110144648.GC16018@totoro>
On 10/11/11 14:46, Jamie Iles wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 01:09:59AM +0000, Jamie Iles wrote:
>> This adds a device tree binding for the VIC based on the of_irq_init()
>> support. This adds an irqdomain to the vic and always registers all
>> vics in the static vic array rather than for pm only to keep track of
>> the irq domain. struct irq_data::hwirq is used where appropriate rather
>> than runtime masking.
>>
>> v2: - use irq_domain_simple_ops
>> - remove stub implementation of vic_of_init for !CONFIG_OF
>> - Make VIC select IRQ_DOMAIN
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
>> Signed-off-by: Jamie Iles <jamie@jamieiles.com>
>> ---
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/vic.txt | 29 +++++++
>> arch/arm/common/Kconfig | 1 +
>> arch/arm/common/vic.c | 106 ++++++++++++++++++-------
>> arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/vic.h | 7 ++-
>> 4 files changed, 114 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/vic.txt
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/common/vic.c b/arch/arm/common/vic.c
>> index 01f18a4..e689975 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/common/vic.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/common/vic.c
>> @@ -22,6 +22,10 @@
> [...]
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
>> +int __init vic_of_init(struct device_node *node, struct device_node *parent)
>> +{
>> + void __iomem *regs;
>> + int irq_base;
>> +
>> + if (WARN(parent, "non-root VICs are not supported"))
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + regs = of_iomap(node, 0);
>> + if (WARN_ON(!regs))
>> + return -EIO;
>> +
>> + irq_base = irq_alloc_descs(-1, 0, 32, numa_node_id());
>> + if (WARN_ON(irq_base < 0))
>> + goto out_unmap;
>
> Hmm, this appears to need linux/export.h for THIS_MODULE now.
> linux/irq.h has a comment saying it uses a macro to avoid needing an
> include of export.h there so I guess it needs to go in here instead.
Yes, I had to hack it when I tested this series on PB1176 (and of course
forgot to send the patch around...).
It seems a bit backward to impose including linux/export.h while this
file doesn't use any of it directly.
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-10 15:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-04 1:09 [PATCHv4 00/13] VIC DT binding and MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER Jamie Iles
2011-11-04 1:09 ` [PATCHv4 01/13] ARM: Make global handler and CONFIG_MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER mutually exclusive Jamie Iles
2011-11-04 1:09 ` [PATCHv4 02/13] ARM: vic: device tree binding Jamie Iles
2011-11-10 14:46 ` Jamie Iles
2011-11-10 15:20 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2011-11-10 16:28 ` Jamie Iles
2011-11-04 1:10 ` [PATCHv4 03/13] ARM: vic: MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER handler Jamie Iles
2011-11-04 1:10 ` [PATCHv4 04/13] ARM: ep93xx: convert to MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER Jamie Iles
2011-11-04 1:10 ` [PATCHv4 05/13] ARM: netx: " Jamie Iles
2011-11-04 1:10 ` [PATCHv4 06/13] ARM: nomadik: " Jamie Iles
2011-11-04 1:10 ` [PATCHv4 07/13] ARM: s3c64xx: " Jamie Iles
2011-11-09 11:25 ` Thomas Abraham
2011-11-09 11:34 ` Thomas Abraham
2011-11-09 11:54 ` Jamie Iles
2011-11-09 12:30 ` Thomas Abraham
2011-11-10 14:53 ` Jamie Iles
2011-11-10 16:19 ` Thomas Abraham
2011-11-09 14:50 ` Rob Herring
2011-11-09 14:55 ` Jamie Iles
2011-11-04 1:10 ` [PATCHv4 08/13] ARM: spear: " Jamie Iles
2011-11-09 10:15 ` Viresh Kumar
2011-11-04 1:10 ` [PATCHv4 09/13] ARM: u300: " Jamie Iles
2011-11-04 1:10 ` [PATCHv4 10/13] ARM: versatile: " Jamie Iles
2011-11-09 10:25 ` Marc Zyngier
2011-11-04 1:10 ` [PATCHv4 11/13] ARM: samsung: " Jamie Iles
2011-11-04 1:10 ` [PATCHv4 12/13] ARM: picoxcell: " Jamie Iles
2011-11-04 1:10 ` [PATCHv4 13/13] ARM: VIC: remove non MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER support Jamie Iles
2011-11-09 10:01 ` [PATCHv4 00/13] VIC DT binding and MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER Jamie Iles
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EBBEBD3.8090001@arm.com \
--to=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).