From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: b-cousson@ti.com (Cousson, Benoit) Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 15:56:05 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v5 4/7] arm: omap4: hwmod: introduce emu hwmod In-Reply-To: <20111111114735.GC5114@totoro> References: <1319467559-5518-1-git-send-email-ming.lei@canonical.com> <1319467559-5518-5-git-send-email-ming.lei@canonical.com> <20111111114147.GE12410@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> <20111111114735.GC5114@totoro> Message-ID: <4EBD3785.4050102@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 11/11/2011 12:47 PM, Jamie Iles wrote: > On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 11:41:47AM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: >> [Adding Benoit to CC]. >> >> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 09:02:14AM +0000, Paul Walmsley wrote: >>> On Wed, 9 Nov 2011, Ming Lei wrote: >>>> Also, current arm perf code don't handle three IRQs(one pl310 irq and >>>> two CTI irq) inside one device correctly. >>> >>> To fix this, that ARM perf code should either be using >>> platform_get_irq_byname(), or the hwmod hardware data will need to be >>> rearranged to meet the arbitrary ordering requirement. I'd suggest >>> pinging Will on this issue to see what he wants to do. >> >> The issue stems from the fact that we have to route the PMU interrupts to >> the correct CPU manually (I think only MSM routes them as PPIs, which is >> clearly the correct thing to do). To do this, we expect the IRQ resources to >> be laid out in CPU order. In hindsight, maybe naming the resources might >> have been a good idea, but them we'd still have to generate the names using >> CPU numbers when iterating through the platform device. > > There isn't yet a way to do naming of resources with DT, and although I > think there was a proposal for doing named register resources I don't > think this has been accepted and there wasn't anything for IRQ > resources... It will come soon... along with the updated patch for reg-names support. Regards, Benoit