From: robherring2@gmail.com (Rob Herring)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: use cache type functions for arch_get_unmapped_area
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 17:37:10 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EC2F7A6.60602@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4EC17BEA.2050104@gmail.com>
On 11/14/2011 02:36 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On 11/14/2011 02:27 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
>> Hi Rob, Nico,
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 05:36:57PM +0000, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>>> On Mon, 7 Nov 2011, Rob Herring wrote:
>>>
>>>> From: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
>>>>
>>>> There are already cache type decoding functions, so use those instead
>>>> of custom decode code which only works for ARMv6.
>>>>
>>>> This change also correctly enables cache colour alignment on Cortex-A9
>>>> whose I-cache is aliasing VIPT.
>>
>> I appreciate that this is preserving the current behaviour, but why do we need
>> to ensure colour alignment when only the I-side is aliasing?
>>
>> In the case that there is a MAP_SHARED, PROT_WRITE|PROT_EXEC mapping then
>> explicit cache maintenance will still be required by the task writing to the
>> page and also the task executing the written data (not to mention the
>> synchronisation requirements). Russell confirmed this recently:
>>
What if you have 2 tasks that are executing code from the same page?
Perhaps it doesn't matter as the I caches are separate?
>> http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/lurker/message/20110923.193941.47decb13.en.html
>>
>> no amount of colouring can avoid that, so why not only bother with it when
>> we alias on the D-side? On a coherent system it's reasonable to expect that
>> to work across tasks, so we definitely need the colouring correction there.
>
> I wasn't too sure about that, so I'll drop the i-cache part.
>
However, the original code and comments did check for aliasing I cache.
So dropping I-cache check could change v6 behavior if there are any
systems with only aliasing I cache.
Rob
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-15 23:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-07 23:43 [PATCH 1/2] ARM: use cache type functions for arch_get_unmapped_area Rob Herring
2011-11-07 23:43 ` [PATCH 2/2] ARM: topdown mmap support Rob Herring
2011-11-14 17:41 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-11-14 18:05 ` Rob Herring
2011-11-14 18:22 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-11-15 23:02 ` Rob Herring
2011-11-16 23:45 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-11-14 17:36 ` [PATCH 1/2] ARM: use cache type functions for arch_get_unmapped_area Nicolas Pitre
2011-11-14 20:27 ` Will Deacon
2011-11-14 20:36 ` Rob Herring
2011-11-15 23:37 ` Rob Herring [this message]
2011-11-16 9:48 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EC2F7A6.60602@gmail.com \
--to=robherring2@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).