From: sshtylyov@mvista.com (Sergei Shtylyov)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 4/5] ARM: davinci: create new common platform header for davinci
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 14:48:17 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EC4E671.8030105@mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1321525138-3928-5-git-send-email-manjunath.hadli@ti.com>
Hello.
On 17-11-2011 14:18, Manjunath Hadli wrote:
> remove the code from individual platform header files for
> dm365, dm355, dm644x and dm646x and consolidate it into a
> single and common header file davinci_common.h.
> Include the new header file in individual platform header
> files as a pre-cursor for deleting these headers in follow
> up patches.
> Signed-off-by: Manjunath Hadli<manjunath.hadli@ti.com>
[...]
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/include/mach/davinci.h b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/include/mach/davinci.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..49bf2f3
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/include/mach/davinci.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
[...]
> +/* DM355 base addresses */
> +#define DM355_ASYNC_EMIF_CONTROL_BASE 0x01e10000
> +#define DM355_ASYNC_EMIF_DATA_CE0_BASE 0x02000000
> +/* DM365 base addresses */
> +#define DM365_ASYNC_EMIF_CONTROL_BASE 0x01d10000
> +#define DM365_ASYNC_EMIF_DATA_CE0_BASE 0x02000000
> +#define DM365_ASYNC_EMIF_DATA_CE1_BASE 0x04000000
Note that DM355/365 EMIF CE0/1 bases are similar -- perhaps it's worth to
have the single definition for them now, like DM3X5_ASYNC_EMIF_DATA_CE<n>_BASE.
WBR, Sergei
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-17 10:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-17 10:18 [PATCH v3 0/5] ARM: davinci: re-arrange definitions to have a common davinci header Manjunath Hadli
2011-11-17 10:18 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] ARM: davinci: dm644x: remove the macros from the header to move to c file Manjunath Hadli
2011-11-17 10:18 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] ARM: davinci: dm365: " Manjunath Hadli
2011-11-17 10:18 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] ARM: davinci: dm646x: " Manjunath Hadli
2011-11-17 10:18 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] ARM: davinci: create new common platform header for davinci Manjunath Hadli
2011-11-17 10:35 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2011-11-17 10:48 ` Sergei Shtylyov [this message]
2011-11-17 10:59 ` Hadli, Manjunath
2011-11-17 10:18 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] ARM: davinci: delete individual platform header files and use a common header Manjunath Hadli
2011-11-17 10:38 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2011-11-30 11:37 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] ARM: davinci: re-arrange definitions to have a common davinci header Nori, Sekhar
2011-12-02 6:29 ` Hadli, Manjunath
2011-12-02 12:42 ` Nori, Sekhar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EC4E671.8030105@mvista.com \
--to=sshtylyov@mvista.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).